From: Fariborz Jahanian Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:07:16 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Compare matching selectors in current and X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=dbdec8bcb5686cd34763db49488f77e88c43eb64;p=clang Compare matching selectors in current and super class(s) and warn on any parameter type mismatch if potentially unsafe. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@78029 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td index 5a7fbf4ff5..cdb79b4dc4 100644 --- a/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td +++ b/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td @@ -2060,6 +2060,7 @@ def error_protected_ivar_access : Error<"instance variable %0 is protected">, def warn_maynot_respond : Warning<"%0 may not respond to %1">; def warn_attribute_method_def : Warning< "method attribute can only be specified on method declarations">; - - +def ext_typecheck_base_super : ExtWarn< + "method parameter type %0 does not match " + "super class method parameter type %1">; } diff --git a/lib/Sema/Sema.h b/lib/Sema/Sema.h index 2a77f21a2d..6cad4b2f14 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/Sema.h +++ b/lib/Sema/Sema.h @@ -2872,6 +2872,10 @@ public: const IdentifierInfo *Name); void ComparePropertiesInBaseAndSuper(ObjCInterfaceDecl *IDecl); + void CompareMethodParamsInBaseAndSuper(Decl *IDecl, + ObjCMethodDecl *MethodDecl, + bool IsInstance); + void MergeProtocolPropertiesIntoClass(Decl *CDecl, DeclPtrTy MergeProtocols); diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclObjC.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclObjC.cpp index 26f590578c..0ee0ad730f 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaDeclObjC.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaDeclObjC.cpp @@ -1464,6 +1464,37 @@ void Sema::ProcessPropertyDecl(ObjCPropertyDecl *property, AddInstanceMethodToGlobalPool(SetterMethod); } +void Sema::CompareMethodParamsInBaseAndSuper(Decl *ClassDecl, + ObjCMethodDecl *Method, + bool IsInstance) { + if (ObjCInterfaceDecl *ID = dyn_cast(ClassDecl)) + while (ObjCInterfaceDecl *SD = ID->getSuperClass()) { + if (ObjCMethodDecl *SuperMethodDecl = + SD->lookupMethod(Method->getSelector(), IsInstance)) { + ObjCMethodDecl::param_iterator ParamI = Method->param_begin(), + E = Method->param_end(); + ObjCMethodDecl::param_iterator PrevI = + SuperMethodDecl->param_begin(); + for (; ParamI != E; ++ParamI, ++PrevI) { + assert(PrevI != SuperMethodDecl->param_end() && "Param mismatch"); + QualType T1 = Context.getCanonicalType((*ParamI)->getType()); + QualType T2 = Context.getCanonicalType((*PrevI)->getType()); + if (T1 != T2) { + AssignConvertType ConvTy = CheckAssignmentConstraints(T1, T2); + if (ConvTy == Incompatible || ConvTy == IncompatiblePointer) { + Diag((*ParamI)->getLocation(), diag::ext_typecheck_base_super) + << T1 << T2; + Diag(SuperMethodDecl->getLocation(), + diag::note_previous_declaration); + return; + } + } + } + } + ID = SD; + } +} + // Note: For class/category implemenations, allMethods/allProperties is // always null. void Sema::ActOnAtEnd(SourceLocation AtEndLoc, DeclPtrTy classDecl, @@ -1509,6 +1540,7 @@ void Sema::ActOnAtEnd(SourceLocation AtEndLoc, DeclPtrTy classDecl, InsMap[Method->getSelector()] = Method; /// The following allows us to typecheck messages to "id". AddInstanceMethodToGlobalPool(Method); + CompareMethodParamsInBaseAndSuper(ClassDecl, Method, true); } } else { @@ -1526,6 +1558,7 @@ void Sema::ActOnAtEnd(SourceLocation AtEndLoc, DeclPtrTy classDecl, ClsMap[Method->getSelector()] = Method; /// The following allows us to typecheck messages to "Class". AddFactoryMethodToGlobalPool(Method); + CompareMethodParamsInBaseAndSuper(ClassDecl, Method, false); } } } diff --git a/test/SemaObjC/warn-superclass-method-mismatch.m b/test/SemaObjC/warn-superclass-method-mismatch.m new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..eb75eade0a --- /dev/null +++ b/test/SemaObjC/warn-superclass-method-mismatch.m @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +// RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s + +@interface Root +-(void) method_r: (char)ch : (float*)f1 : (int*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}} +@end + +@class Sub; + +@interface Base : Root +-(void) method: (int*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}} +-(void) method1: (Base*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}} +-(void) method2: (Sub*) x; ++ method3: (int)x1 : (Base *)x2 : (float)x3; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}} ++ mathod4: (id)x1; +@end + +struct A { + int x,y,z; +}; + +@interface Sub : Base +-(void) method: (struct A*) a; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'struct A *' does not match super class method parameter type 'int *'}} +-(void) method1: (Sub*) x; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'Base *'}} +-(void) method2: (Base*) x; // no need to warn. At call point we warn if need be. ++ method3: (int)x1 : (Sub *)x2 : (float)x3; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'Base *'}} ++ mathod4: (Base*)x1; +-(void) method_r: (char)ch : (float*)f1 : (Sub*) x; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'int *'}} +@end + +void f(Base *base, Sub *sub) { + int x; + [base method:&x]; // warn. if base is actually 'Sub' it will use -[Sub method] with wrong arguments + + Base *b; + [base method1:b]; // if base is actuall 'Sub' it will use [Sub method1] with wrong argument. + + [base method2:b]; // expected-warning {{}} + + Sub *s; + [base method2:s]; // if base is actually 'Sub' OK. Either way OK. + +} + + + +