From: Sebastian Schuberth Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:29:46 +0000 (+0200) Subject: docs: clarify what git-rebase's "-p" / "--preserve-merges" does X-Git-Tag: v2.3.5~1^2 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d50d31e8808261eccfa6bde826e5e63368e29573;p=git docs: clarify what git-rebase's "-p" / "--preserve-merges" does Ignoring a merge can be read as ignoring the changes a merge commit introduces altogether, as if the entire side branch the merge commit merged was removed from the history. But that is not what happens if "-p" is not specified. What happens is that the individual commits a merge commit introduces are replayed in order, and only any possible merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to the merge commit are ignored. Get this straight in the docs. Also, do not say that merge commits are *tried* to be recreated. As that is true almost everywhere it is better left unsaid. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- diff --git a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt index 2a93c645bd..be15b76871 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-rebase.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-rebase.txt @@ -358,7 +358,9 @@ unless the `--fork-point` option is specified. -p:: --preserve-merges:: - Instead of ignoring merges, try to recreate them. + Recreate merge commits instead of flattening the history by replaying + commits a merge commit introduces. Merge conflict resolutions or manual + amendments to merge commits are not preserved. + This uses the `--interactive` machinery internally, but combining it with the `--interactive` option explicitly is generally not a good