From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:27:24 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: - We're not going to be doing an unmodified 2.0.31 release, so noting the
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d4b9068b82ebb8c20f9e6a5a7819544b361ed213;p=apache

- We're not going to be doing an unmodified 2.0.31 release, so noting the
  AP_DEBUG_ASSERT fix isn't helpful.
- The vote for perchild being required for GA is unanimous against.  No
  matter what interpretation you take, it isn't going to be a showstopper.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93320 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 5c433c7714..4cd3d29779 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:23:48 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/06 22:27:24 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -79,10 +79,7 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES:
 
             * erroneous check in an AP_DEBUG_ASSERT() call.  Only happens
               in maintainer mode.  Fixed in modules/http/http_protocol.c
-              revision 1.391.  Add item in release notes:
-                +1: Justin, Cliff, Aaron, BillS, Jim, trawick
-                +0:
-                -1:
+              revision 1.391
 
             * seg faults in core_input_filter when the client goes away
               before any POST body bytes are received.
@@ -260,10 +257,6 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
       descriptors between vhost child groups. An API was proposed
       on dev@apr:
         Message-ID: <20020111115006.K1529@clove.org>
-       Vote: Is a non-portable perchild going to hold up a GA release?
-        Yes: 
-         No: Aaron, Justin, trawick, stoddard, Jim, Ian, BrianP, gregames,
-             Ken
 
     * Recent changes to ap_rgetline may have broken EBCDIC boxes.
         Message-ID: <20020122072605.GF28051@ebuilt.com>