From: Justin Erenkrantz Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:21:43 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Start tracking the PRs for known RFC 2616 violations. (Note that the test X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d329557171d4762cf4b794818eb9fb8aecaa6058;p=apache Start tracking the PRs for known RFC 2616 violations. (Note that the test cases in the PR are ridiculously hard to follow.) These tend to be primarily in caching/proxy, but some are in the core. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@98729 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 7bbfee3c1d..c643e635c9 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/18 21:06:15 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2003/02/19 07:21:43 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ CURRENT VOTES: RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: + * RFC 2616 violations. + Closed PRs: 15857. + Open PRs: 15852, 15859, 15861, 15864, 15865, 15866, 15868, 15869, + 15870, 16120, 16125, 16126, 16133, 16135, 16136, 16137, + 16138, 16139, 16140, 16142, 16518, 16520, 16521, + jerenkrantz says: need to decide how many we need to backport and/or + if these rise to showstopper status. + * There is a bug in how we sort some hooks, at least the pre-config hook. The first time we call the hooks, they are in the correct order, but the second time, we don't sort them correctly. Currently,