From: Andrew M. Kuchling Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:29:29 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [Bug #1031897] Fix order of decorator application X-Git-Tag: v2.4b1~73 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=cebdd3c8f15b7c07ae38dc0849721797d6891c12;p=python [Bug #1031897] Fix order of decorator application --- diff --git a/Doc/whatsnew/whatsnew24.tex b/Doc/whatsnew/whatsnew24.tex index 2c1972c184..66232919aa 100644 --- a/Doc/whatsnew/whatsnew24.tex +++ b/Doc/whatsnew/whatsnew24.tex @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ It's equivalent to: \begin{verbatim} def f(): ... -f = C(B(A(f))) +f = A(B(C(f))) \end{verbatim} Decorators must come on the line before a function definition, and @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ words, \code{@A @B @C(args)} becomes: \begin{verbatim} def f(): ... _deco = C(args) -f = _deco(B(A(f))) +f = A(B(_deco(f))) \end{verbatim} Getting this right can be slightly brain-bending, but it's not too @@ -1455,6 +1455,6 @@ by default. The author would like to thank the following people for offering suggestions, corrections and assistance with various drafts of this -article: Hye-Shik Chang, Michael Dyck, Raymond Hettinger. +article: Hye-Shik Chang, Michael Dyck, Raymond Hettinger, Hamish Lawson. \end{document}