From: Cliff Woolley Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 18:00:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: moving on. X-Git-Tag: 2.0.38~61 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c51839007d218f24cfc29d5e97699ddea01adb5e;p=apache moving on. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@95647 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 4be56962f6..a637793cb8 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/06/13 07:48:22 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/06/13 18:00:18 $] Release: @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ on related projects: CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: + 2.0.38: Cliff plans on tagging TONIGHT (6/13/02). Let's get this thing + wrapped up (again). Just a few last-minute tussles over the + 500 vs. 501 thing and whether we're REALLY done with the + if (!r->header_only) thing (Cliff thinks we're not), and that + should be it. RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: @@ -94,7 +99,7 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: Message-ID: <20020613001913.J22524@apache.org> Is this a showstopper? +1: Justin - -1: + -1: Cliff * Returning invalid 304 errors when filters are present. [PR 9673] Message-ID: @@ -108,7 +113,7 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: proposed patch. Consensus needed. Is this a showstopper? +1: Justin - -1: + -1: Cliff * server pushed CGI's not working. (Is this a showstopper??) PR: 8482