From: Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 07:14:59 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Issue #25135: Avoid possible reentrancy issues in deque_clear.
X-Git-Tag: v3.5.1rc1~270
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=bf49fee125047e34927d7ecea1cc9cac53dc3f6f;p=python

Issue #25135: Avoid possible reentrancy issues in deque_clear.
---

diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
index c7eec4fbf3..249bd5a8cb 100644
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ Library
   respects the letter case given by the user. This restores the ability to
   write encoding names in uppercase like "UTF-8", which worked in Python 2.
 
+- Issue #25135: Make deque_clear() safer by emptying the deque before clearing.
+  This helps avoid possible reentrancy issues.
+
 - Issue #19143: platform module now reads Windows version from kernel32.dll to
   avoid compatibility shims.
 
diff --git a/Modules/_collectionsmodule.c b/Modules/_collectionsmodule.c
index f450f25bf2..5dea8cbbd1 100644
--- a/Modules/_collectionsmodule.c
+++ b/Modules/_collectionsmodule.c
@@ -1038,16 +1038,72 @@ PyDoc_STRVAR(remove_doc,
 static void
 deque_clear(dequeobject *deque)
 {
+    block *b;
+    block *prevblock;
+    block *leftblock;
+    Py_ssize_t leftindex;
+    Py_ssize_t n;
     PyObject *item;
 
+    /* During the process of clearing a deque, decrefs can cause the
+       deque to mutate.  To avoid fatal confusion, we have to make the
+       deque empty before clearing the blocks and never refer to
+       anything via deque->ref while clearing.  (This is the same
+       technique used for clearing lists, sets, and dicts.)
+
+       Making the deque empty requires allocating a new empty block.  In
+       the unlikely event that memory is full, we fall back to an
+       alternate method that doesn't require a new block.  Repeating
+       pops in a while-loop is slower, possibly re-entrant (and a clever
+       adversary could cause it to never terminate).
+    */
+
+    b = newblock(0);
+    if (b == NULL) {
+        PyErr_Clear();
+        goto alternate_method;
+    }
+
+    /* Remember the old size, leftblock, and leftindex */
+    leftblock = deque->leftblock;
+    leftindex = deque->leftindex;
+    n = Py_SIZE(deque);
+
+    /* Set the deque to be empty using the newly allocated block */
+    MARK_END(b->leftlink);
+    MARK_END(b->rightlink);
+    Py_SIZE(deque) = 0;
+    deque->leftblock = b;
+    deque->rightblock = b;
+    deque->leftindex = CENTER + 1;
+    deque->rightindex = CENTER;
+    deque->state++;
+
+    /* Now the old size, leftblock, and leftindex are disconnected from
+       the empty deque and we can use them to decref the pointers.
+    */
+    while (n--) {
+        item = leftblock->data[leftindex];
+        Py_DECREF(item);
+        leftindex++;
+        if (leftindex == BLOCKLEN && n) {
+            CHECK_NOT_END(leftblock->rightlink);
+            prevblock = leftblock;
+            leftblock = leftblock->rightlink;
+            leftindex = 0;
+            freeblock(prevblock);
+        }
+    }
+    CHECK_END(leftblock->rightlink);
+    freeblock(leftblock);
+    return;
+
+  alternate_method:
     while (Py_SIZE(deque)) {
         item = deque_pop(deque, NULL);
         assert (item != NULL);
         Py_DECREF(item);
     }
-    assert(deque->leftblock == deque->rightblock);
-    assert(deque->leftindex - 1 == deque->rightindex);
-    assert(Py_SIZE(deque) == 0);
 }
 
 static int