From: Douglas Gregor Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 06:20:02 +0000 (+0000) Subject: When the condition of a switch() statement is semantically invalid, X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=be724bab2ba7ad47aebced25e7c8ec551eb72d28;p=clang When the condition of a switch() statement is semantically invalid, still parse the body of the switch to try to avoid spurious diagnostics. Fixes PR5606. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@89847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp b/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp index 2022fa51cf..c87010e356 100644 --- a/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp +++ b/lib/Parse/ParseStmt.cpp @@ -715,9 +715,7 @@ Parser::OwningStmtResult Parser::ParseSwitchStatement(AttributeList *Attr) { FullExprArg FullCond(Actions.FullExpr(Cond)); - OwningStmtResult Switch(Actions); - if (!Cond.isInvalid() || CondVar.get()) - Switch = Actions.ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt(FullCond, CondVar); + OwningStmtResult Switch = Actions.ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt(FullCond, CondVar); // C99 6.8.4p3 - In C99, the body of the switch statement is a scope, even if // there is no compound stmt. C90 does not have this clause. We only do this diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp index b54de3e171..e2b065bb90 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp @@ -288,12 +288,8 @@ Sema::ActOnStartOfSwitchStmt(FullExprArg cond, DeclPtrTy CondVar) { if (CondResult.isInvalid()) return StmtError(); } - Expr *ConditionExpr = CondResult.takeAs(); - if (!ConditionExpr) - return StmtError(); - - CondResult.release(); - SwitchStmt *SS = new (Context) SwitchStmt(ConditionVar, ConditionExpr); + SwitchStmt *SS = new (Context) SwitchStmt(ConditionVar, + CondResult.takeAs()); getSwitchStack().push_back(SS); return Owned(SS); } @@ -496,6 +492,11 @@ Sema::ActOnFinishSwitchStmt(SourceLocation SwitchLoc, StmtArg Switch, SS->setBody(BodyStmt, SwitchLoc); getSwitchStack().pop_back(); + if (SS->getCond() == 0) { + SS->Destroy(Context); + return StmtError(); + } + Expr *CondExpr = SS->getCond(); QualType CondTypeBeforePromotion = GetTypeBeforeIntegralPromotion(CondExpr); diff --git a/test/Sema/switch.c b/test/Sema/switch.c index 122947e7ce..3ee371202f 100644 --- a/test/Sema/switch.c +++ b/test/Sema/switch.c @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ // RUN: clang-cc -fsyntax-only -verify %s - void f (int z) { while (z) { default: z--; // expected-error {{statement not in switch}} @@ -75,3 +74,14 @@ void test6() { break; } } + +// PR5606 +int f0(int var) { + switch (va) { // expected-error{{use of undeclared identifier 'va'}} + case 1: + break; + case 2: + return 1; + } + return 2; +}