From: Krzysztof Parzyszek Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 19:17:32 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [Hexagon] Fix a bug in r308502: post-inc offset is always 0 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b8ae3835b5c98457635a34854efe187d93fcf3d7;p=llvm [Hexagon] Fix a bug in r308502: post-inc offset is always 0 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@308510 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonInstrInfo.cpp b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonInstrInfo.cpp index 370af950942..b0101e6f261 100644 --- a/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonInstrInfo.cpp +++ b/lib/Target/Hexagon/HexagonInstrInfo.cpp @@ -1715,8 +1715,8 @@ bool HexagonInstrInfo::areMemAccessesTriviallyDisjoint( if (!MIa.getOperand(OffsetPosA).isImm() || !MIb.getOperand(OffsetPosB).isImm()) return false; - int OffsetA = OffA.getImm(); - int OffsetB = OffB.getImm(); + int OffsetA = isPostIncrement(MIa) ? 0 : OffA.getImm(); + int OffsetB = isPostIncrement(MIb) ? 0 : OffB.getImm(); // This is a mem access with the same base register and known offsets from it. // Reason about it. diff --git a/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/postinc-baseoffset.mir b/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/postinc-baseoffset.mir new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..69337e92dda --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/postinc-baseoffset.mir @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# RUN: llc -march=hexagon -start-before hexagon-packetizer %s -o - | FileCheck %s + +# Check that we don't packetize these two instructions together. It happened +# earlier because "offset" in the post-increment instruction was taken to be 8. + +# CHECK: memw(r0+#0) = #-1 +# CHECK: } +# CHECK: { +# CHECK: r1 = memw(r0++#8) + +--- | + define void @fred(i32* %a) { ret void } +... +--- +name: fred +tracksRegLiveness: true + +body: | + bb.0: + liveins: %r0 + S4_storeiri_io %r0, 0, -1 :: (store 4 into %ir.a) + %r1, %r0 = L2_loadri_pi %r0, 8 :: (load 4 from %ir.a)