From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:52:24 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: make more positive.
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b0c4c63bb9a44e6b602d8ec3c3121c3ab5fc1e84;p=clang

make more positive.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44758 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index 973e9758fc..bfb01f3290 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     </ul>
     
-    <p>Cons of GCC vs clang:</p>
+    <p>Pros of clang vs GCC:</p>
     
     <ul>
     <li>GCC has a very old codebase which presents a steep learning curve to new
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
         but requires you to write C++ code to extend it.</li>
     </ul>
     
-    <p>Cons of Elsa vs clang:</p>
+    <p>Pros of clang vs Elsa:</p>
     
     <ul>
     <li>The Elsa community is extremely small and major development work seems
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
         compiler.</li>
     </ul>
     
-    <p>Cons of PCC vs clang:</p>
+    <p>Pros of clang vs PCC:</p>
     
     <ul>
     <li>PCC dates from the 1970's and has been dormant for most of that time.