From: Fred Drake Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 16:57:31 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Work around the problem of spaces after a "}" being dropped by LaTeX2HTML if X-Git-Tag: v2.2.1c1~364 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b062cb22d07acd56c38db7df1981bc02761ada45;p=python Work around the problem of spaces after a "}" being dropped by LaTeX2HTML if they were represented by newlines in the document source. Partially fixes SF bug #493243. --- diff --git a/Doc/ref/ref5.tex b/Doc/ref/ref5.tex index 10b52c3e25..9ed93370b6 100644 --- a/Doc/ref/ref5.tex +++ b/Doc/ref/ref5.tex @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ is equivalent to a call with M+N positional arguments A consequence of this is that although the \samp{*expression} syntax appears \emph{after} any keyword arguments, it is processed -\emph{before} the keyword arguments (and the \samp{**expression} -argument, if any -- see below). So: +\emph{before} the keyword arguments (and the +\samp{**expression} argument, if any -- see below). So: \begin{verbatim} >>> def f(a, b): @@ -527,9 +527,9 @@ TypeError: f() got multiple values for keyword argument 'a' 1 2 \end{verbatim} -It is unusual for both keyword arguments and the \samp{*expression} -syntax to be used in the same call, so in practice this confusion does -not arise. +It is unusual for both keyword arguments and the +\samp{*expression} syntax to be used in the same call, so in practice +this confusion does not arise. If the syntax \samp{**expression} appears in the function call, \samp{expression} must evaluate to a (subclass of) dictionary, the