From: Ian Holsman <ianh@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 06:08:12 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: does anyone need/use ndbm?
X-Git-Tag: 2.0.30~118
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ad901875e5eb79f4f310ef88c36dfd53f0ac1512;p=apache

does anyone need/use ndbm?
if so should we make it a apr_util_dbm DB type?
PR:
Obtained from:
Submitted by:
Reviewed by:


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@92617 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 4b0a9a987e..b0e9ea742c 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:						-*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:03:13 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/27 06:08:12 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
                     a userlist via dbm, which has to remain readable between
                     builds/machines, etc.  The use-multiple database schema
                     for apr-util would let us do this with just apr, though."
+		Ian says:  "multi-dbm is in, but it still has ndbm support hardcoded
+		            is this still required? isn't ndbm supported via gdbm?"
+
 
     * Integrate mod_dav.
         Some additional items remaining: