From: Richard Smith <richard-llvm@metafoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:06:26 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: -Wunsequenced: if the LHS of an &&, || or ?: is not constant, check for
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=995e4a7530d705147c875b63608532c483c011a8;p=clang

-Wunsequenced: if the LHS of an &&, || or ?: is not constant, check for
unsequenced operations in the RHS. We don't compare the RHS with the rest of
the expression yet; such checks will need care to avoid diagnosing unsequenced
operations which are both in conditionally-evaluated subexpressions which
actually can't occur together, such as in '(b && ++x) + (!b && ++x)'.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@172760 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
index 69500ae87c..1b9239c6e9 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp
@@ -5507,9 +5507,18 @@ public:
 
     bool Result;
     if (!BO->getLHS()->isValueDependent() &&
-        BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context) &&
-        !Result)
-      Visit(BO->getRHS());
+        BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context)) {
+      if (!Result)
+        Visit(BO->getRHS());
+    } else {
+      // Check for unsequenced operations in the RHS, treating it as an
+      // entirely separate evaluation.
+      //
+      // FIXME: If there are operations in the RHS which are unsequenced
+      // with respect to operations outside the RHS, and those operations
+      // are unconditionally evaluated, diagnose them.
+      SequenceChecker(SemaRef, BO->getRHS());
+    }
   }
   void VisitBinLAnd(BinaryOperator *BO) {
     {
@@ -5519,9 +5528,12 @@ public:
 
     bool Result;
     if (!BO->getLHS()->isValueDependent() &&
-        BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context) &&
-        Result)
-      Visit(BO->getRHS());
+        BO->getLHS()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context)) {
+      if (Result)
+        Visit(BO->getRHS());
+    } else {
+      SequenceChecker(SemaRef, BO->getRHS());
+    }
   }
 
   // Only visit the condition, unless we can be sure which subexpression will
@@ -5534,6 +5546,10 @@ public:
     if (!CO->getCond()->isValueDependent() &&
         CO->getCond()->EvaluateAsBooleanCondition(Result, SemaRef.Context))
       Visit(Result ? CO->getTrueExpr() : CO->getFalseExpr());
+    else {
+      SequenceChecker(SemaRef, CO->getTrueExpr());
+      SequenceChecker(SemaRef, CO->getFalseExpr());
+    }
   }
 
   void VisitCXXConstructExpr(CXXConstructExpr *CCE) {
diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsequenced.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsequenced.cpp
index dcac097586..15ca1dba7a 100644
--- a/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsequenced.cpp
+++ b/test/SemaCXX/warn-unsequenced.cpp
@@ -88,4 +88,11 @@ void test() {
   xs[0] = (a = 1, a); // ok
   (a -= 128) &= 128; // ok
   ++a += 1; // ok
+
+  xs[8] ? ++a + a++ : 0; // expected-warning {{multiple unsequenced modifications}}
+  xs[8] ? 0 : ++a + a++; // expected-warning {{multiple unsequenced modifications}}
+  xs[8] ? ++a : a++; // ok
+
+  xs[8] && (++a + a++); // expected-warning {{multiple unsequenced modifications}}
+  xs[8] || (++a + a++); // expected-warning {{multiple unsequenced modifications}}
 }