From: Ivan Levkivskyi Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:42:09 +0000 (+0100) Subject: bpo-28810: Update lnotab_notes.txt (#665) X-Git-Tag: v3.7.0a1~1126 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9135275cba680902e6caf29461f0423dc570190d;p=python bpo-28810: Update lnotab_notes.txt (#665) --- diff --git a/Objects/lnotab_notes.txt b/Objects/lnotab_notes.txt index 515375772e..3dab2b9866 100644 --- a/Objects/lnotab_notes.txt +++ b/Objects/lnotab_notes.txt @@ -1,17 +1,18 @@ All about co_lnotab, the line number table. Code objects store a field named co_lnotab. This is an array of unsigned bytes -disguised as a Python string. It is used to map bytecode offsets to source code -line #s for tracebacks and to identify line number boundaries for line tracing. +disguised as a Python bytes object. It is used to map bytecode offsets to +source code line #s for tracebacks and to identify line number boundaries for +line tracing. The array is conceptually a compressed list of (bytecode offset increment, line number increment) pairs. The details are important and delicate, best illustrated by example: byte code offset source code line number - 0 1 - 6 2 - 50 7 + 0 1 + 6 2 + 50 7 350 207 361 208 @@ -24,7 +25,8 @@ look like: The above doesn't really work, but it's a start. An unsigned byte (byte code offset) can't hold negative values, or values larger than 255, a signed byte (line number) can't hold values larger than 127 or less than -128, and the -above example contains two such values. So we make two tweaks: +above example contains two such values. (Note that before 3.6, line number +was also encoded by an unsigned byte.) So we make two tweaks: (a) there's a deep assumption that byte code offsets increase monotonically, and @@ -52,7 +54,7 @@ the example above, assemble_lnotab in compile.c should not (as was actually done until 2.2) expand 300, 200 to 255, 255, 45, 45, but to - 255, 0, 45, 128, 0, 72. + 255, 0, 45, 127, 0, 73. The above is sufficient to reconstruct line numbers for tracebacks, but not for line tracing. Tracing is handled by PyCode_CheckLineNumber() in codeobject.c @@ -83,30 +85,34 @@ Consider this code: 1: def f(a): 2: while a: -3: print 1, +3: print(1) 4: break 5: else: -6: print 2, +6: print(2) which compiles to this: - 2 0 SETUP_LOOP 19 (to 22) - >> 3 LOAD_FAST 0 (a) - 6 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 17 + 2 0 SETUP_LOOP 26 (to 28) + >> 2 LOAD_FAST 0 (a) + 4 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 18 - 3 9 LOAD_CONST 1 (1) - 12 PRINT_ITEM + 3 6 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (print) + 8 LOAD_CONST 1 (1) + 10 CALL_FUNCTION 1 + 12 POP_TOP - 4 13 BREAK_LOOP - 14 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3 - >> 17 POP_BLOCK + 4 14 BREAK_LOOP + 16 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 2 + >> 18 POP_BLOCK - 6 18 LOAD_CONST 2 (2) - 21 PRINT_ITEM - >> 22 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) - 25 RETURN_VALUE + 6 20 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (print) + 22 LOAD_CONST 2 (2) + 24 CALL_FUNCTION 1 + 26 POP_TOP + >> 28 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) + 30 RETURN_VALUE -If 'a' is false, execution will jump to the POP_BLOCK instruction at offset 17 +If 'a' is false, execution will jump to the POP_BLOCK instruction at offset 18 and the co_lnotab will claim that execution has moved to line 4, which is wrong. In this case, we could instead associate the POP_BLOCK with line 5, but that would break jumps around loops without else clauses.