From: Faisal Vali Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:56:08 +0000 (+0000) Subject: COSMETIC: Fix 80 column overflow in some comments introduced in r194188 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9015bfcaf2f369d0f232f27b2655eb9f5464a280;p=clang COSMETIC: Fix 80 column overflow in some comments introduced in r194188 no functionality change. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@194449 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp index e27bfd8050..59a167a62c 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp @@ -5958,9 +5958,9 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnFinishFullExpr(Expr *FE, SourceLocation CC, CheckCompletedExpr(FullExpr.get(), CC, IsConstexpr); - // At the end of this full expression (which could be a deeply nested lambda), - // if there is a potential capture within the nested lambda, have the outer - // capture-able lambda try and capture it. + // At the end of this full expression (which could be a deeply nested + // lambda), if there is a potential capture within the nested lambda, + // have the outer capture-able lambda try and capture it. // Consider the following code: // void f(int, int); // void f(const int&, double); @@ -5983,10 +5983,10 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnFinishFullExpr(Expr *FE, SourceLocation CC, // }; // } // - // Here, we see +n, and then the full-expression 0; ends, so we don't capture n - // (and instead remove it from our list of potential captures), and then the - // full-expression +n + ({ 0; }); ends, but it's too late for us to see that - // we need to capture n after all. + // Here, we see +n, and then the full-expression 0; ends, so we don't + // capture n (and instead remove it from our list of potential captures), + // and then the full-expression +n + ({ 0; }); ends, but it's too late + // for us to see that we need to capture n after all. LambdaScopeInfo *const CurrentLSI = getCurLambda(); // FIXME: PR 17877 showed that getCurLambda() can return a valid pointer