From: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:41:44 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: rephrase has_key doc
X-Git-Tag: v2.7a1~2690
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=8928a7e911357e57b92aa1738940fec241ded28e;p=python

rephrase has_key doc
---

diff --git a/Doc/ACKS.txt b/Doc/ACKS.txt
index 7680d00110..0bff6bdefe 100644
--- a/Doc/ACKS.txt
+++ b/Doc/ACKS.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ docs@python.org), and we'll be glad to correct the problem.
    * A. Amoroso
    * Pehr Anderson
    * Oliver Andrich
+   * Heidi Annexstad
    * Jesús Cea Avión
    * Daniel Barclay
    * Chris Barker
diff --git a/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst b/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
index f5a4e6c0bd..00d420bda9 100644
--- a/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/stdtypes.rst
@@ -1924,7 +1924,8 @@ pairs within braces, for example: ``{'jack': 4098, 'sjoerd': 4127}`` or ``{4098:
 
    .. method:: has_key(key)
 
-      ``dict.has_key(key)`` is equivalent to ``key in d``, but deprecated.
+      Test for the presence of *key* in the dictionary.  :meth:`has_key` is
+      deprecated in favor of ``key in d``.
 
    .. method:: items()