From: Graham Leggett
As of Apache HTTP server version 2.2 mod_cache
- and mod_file_cache
are no longer marked
- experimental and are considered suitable for production use. These
- caching architectures provide a powerful means to accelerate HTTP
- handling, both as an origin webserver and as a proxy.
mod_cache
and its provider modules
- mod_cache_disk
- provide intelligent, HTTP-aware caching. The content itself is stored
- in the cache, and mod_cache aims to honor all of the various HTTP
- headers and options that control the cachability of content. It can
- handle both local and proxied content. mod_cache
- is aimed at both simple and complex caching configurations, where
- you are dealing with proxied content, dynamic local content or
- have a need to speed up access to local files which change with
- time.
mod_file_cache
on the other hand presents a more
- basic, but sometimes useful, form of caching. Rather than maintain
- the complexity of actively ensuring the cachability of URLs,
- mod_file_cache
offers file-handle and memory-mapping
- tricks to keep a cache of files as they were when httpd was last
- started. As such, mod_file_cache
is aimed at improving
- the access time to local static files which do not change very
- often.
As mod_file_cache
presents a relatively simple
- caching implementation, apart from the specific sections on CacheFile
and MMapFile
, the explanations
- in this guide cover the mod_cache
caching
- architecture.
The Apache HTTP server offers a range of caching features that + are designed to improve the performance of the server in various + ways.
+ +mod_cache
+ and its provider modules
+ mod_cache_disk
+ provide intelligent, HTTP-aware caching. The content itself is stored
+ in the cache, and mod_cache aims to honor all of the various HTTP
+ headers and options that control the cacheability of content
+ as described in
+ Section
+ 13 of RFC2616.
+ mod_cache
+ is aimed at both simple and complex caching configurations, where
+ you are dealing with proxied content, dynamic local content or
+ have a need to speed up access to local files on a potentially
+ slow disk.
+ mod_socache
+ and its provider modules provide a
+ server wide key/value based shared object cache. These modules
+ are designed to cache low level data such as SSL sessions and
+ authentication credentials. Backends allow the data to be stored
+ server wide in shared memory, or datacenter wide in a cache such
+ as memcache or distcache.
+ mod_file_cache
+ offers the ability to pre-load
+ files into memory on server startup, and can improve access
+ times and save file handles on files that are accessed often,
+ as there is no need to go to disk on each request.
+ To get the most from this document, you should be familiar with the basics of HTTP, and have read the Users' Guides to @@ -78,86 +90,168 @@
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
There are two main stages in mod_cache
that can
- occur in the lifetime of a request. First, mod_cache
- is a URL mapping module, which means that if a URL has been cached,
- and the cached version of that URL has not expired, the request will
- be served directly by mod_cache
.
This means that any other stages that might ordinarily happen
- in the process of serving a request -- for example being handled
- by mod_proxy
, or mod_rewrite
--
- won't happen. But then this is the point of caching content in
- the first place.
If the URL is not found within the cache, mod_cache
- will add a filter to the request handling. After
- httpd has located the content by the usual means, the filter will be run
- as the content is served. If the content is determined to be cacheable,
- the content will be saved to the cache for future serving.
If the URL is found within the cache, but also found to have expired,
- the filter is added anyway, but mod_cache
will create
- a conditional request to the backend, to determine if the cached version
- is still current. If the cached version is still current, its
- meta-information will be updated and the request will be served from the
- cache. If the cached version is no longer current, the cached version
- will be deleted and the filter will save the updated content to the cache
- as it is served.
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
The HTTP protocol contains built in support for an in-line caching
+ mechanism
+
+ described by section 13 of RFC2616, and the
+ mod_cache
module can be used to take advantage of
+ this.
Unlike a simple two state key/value cache where the content + disappears completely when no longer fresh, an HTTP cache includes + a mechanism to retain stale content, and to ask the origin server + whether this stale content has changed and if not, make it fresh + again.
+ +An entry in an HTTP cache exists in one of three states:
+ +If the content is too old (older than its freshness + lifetime), it is considered stale. An + HTTP cache should contact the origin server and check whether + the content is still fresh before serving stale content to a + client. The origin server will either respond with replacement + content if not still valid, or ideally, the origin server will + respond with a code to tell the cache the content is still + fresh, without the need to generate or send the content again. + The content becomes fresh again and the cycle continues.
+ +The HTTP protocol does allow the cache to serve stale data
+ under certain circumstances, such as when an attempt to freshen
+ the data with an origin server has failed with a 5xx error, or
+ when another request is already in the process of freshening
+ the given entry. In these cases a Warning
header
+ is added to the response.
Full details of how HTTP caching works can be found in + + Section 13 of RFC2616.
+ +The mod_cache
module hooks into the server in two
+ possible places depending on the value of the
+ CacheQuickHandler
directive:
+
This phase happens very early on during the request processing, + just after the request has been parsed. If the content is + found within the cache, it is served immediately and almost + all request processing is bypassed.
+ +In this scenario, the cache behaves as if it has been "bolted + on" to the front of the server.
+ +This mode offers the best performance, as the majority of + server processing is bypassed. This mode however also bypasses the + authentication and authorization phases of server processing, so + this mode should be chosen with care when this is important.
+This phase happens late in the request processing, after all + the request phases have completed.
+ +In this scenario, the cache behaves as if it has been "bolted + on" to the back of the server.
+ +This mode offers the most flexibility, as the potential exists + for caching to occur at a precisely controlled point in the filter + chain, and cached content can be filtered or personalized before + being sent to the client.
+If the URL is not found within the cache, mod_cache
+ will add a filter to the filter stack in order
+ to record the response to the cache, and then stand down, allowing normal
+ request processing to continue. If the content is determined to be
+ cacheable, the content will be saved to the cache for future serving,
+ otherwise the content will be ignored.
If the content found within the cache is stale, the
+ mod_cache
module converts the request into a
+ conditional request. If the origin server responds with
+ a normal response, the normal response is cached, replacing the content
+ already cached. If the origin server responds with a 304 Not Modified
+ response, the content is marked as fresh again, and the cached content
+ is served by the filter instead of saving it.
When caching locally generated content, ensuring that
- UseCanonicalName
is set to
- On
can dramatically improve the ratio of cache hits. This
- is because the hostname of the virtual-host serving the content forms
- a part of the cache key. With the setting set to On
+
When a virtual host is known by one of many different server aliases,
+ ensuring that UseCanonicalName
is
+ set to On
can dramatically improve the ratio of cache hits.
+ This is because the hostname of the virtual-host serving the content is
+ used within the cache key. With the setting set to On
virtual-hosts with multiple server names or aliases will not produce
differently cached entities, and instead content will be cached as
per the canonical hostname.
Because caching is performed within the URL to filename translation - phase, cached documents will only be served in response to URL requests. - Ordinarily this is of little consequence, but there is one circumstance - in which it matters: If you are using Server - Side Includes;
- -
-<!-- The following include can be cached -->
-<!--#include virtual="/footer.html" -->
-
-<!-- The following include can not be cached -->
-<!--#include file="/path/to/footer.html" -->
-
If you are using Server Side Includes, and want the benefit of speedy
- serves from the cache, you should use virtual
include
- types.
Well formed content that is intended to be cached should declare an
+ explicit freshness lifetime with the Cache-Control
+ header's max-age
or s-maxage
fields, or
+ by including an Expires
header.
At the same time, the origin server defined freshness lifetime can
+ be overridden by a client when the client presents their own
+ Cache-Control
header within the request. In this case,
+ the lowest freshness lifetime between request and response wins.
The default expiry period for cached entities is one hour, however
- this can be easily over-ridden by using the CacheDefaultExpire
directive. This
- default is only used when the original source of the content does not
- specify an expire time or time of last modification.
When this freshness lifetime is missing from the request or the
+ response, a default freshness lifetime is applied. The default
+ freshness lifetime for cached entities is one hour, however
+ this can be easily over-ridden by using the CacheDefaultExpire
directive.
If a response does not include an Expires
header but does
include a Last-Modified
header, mod_cache
- can infer an expiry period based on the use of the CacheLastModifiedFactor
directive.
CacheLastModifiedFactor
directive.
- For local content, mod_expires
may be used to
- fine-tune the expiry period.
For local content, or for remote content that does not define its own
+ Expires
header, mod_expires
may be used to
+ fine-tune the freshness lifetime by adding max-age
and
+ Expires
.
The maximum expiry period may also be controlled by using the +
The maximum freshness lifetime may also be controlled by using the
CacheMaxExpire
.
When content expires from the cache and is re-requested from the - backend or content provider, rather than pass on the original request, - httpd will use a conditional request instead.
- -HTTP offers a number of headers which allow a client, or cache - to discern between different versions of the same content. For - example if a resource was served with an "Etag:" header, it is - possible to make a conditional request with an "If-None-Match:" - header. If a resource was served with a "Last-Modified:" header - it is possible to make a conditional request with an - "If-Modified-Since:" header, and so on.
- -When such a conditional request is made, the response differs - depending on whether the content matches the conditions. If a request is - made with an "If-Modified-Since:" header, and the content has not been - modified since the time indicated in the request then a terse "304 Not - Modified" response is issued.
- -If the content has changed, then it is served as if the request were - not conditional to begin with.
- -The benefits of conditional requests in relation to caching are - twofold. Firstly, when making such a request to the backend, if the - content from the backend matches the content in the store, this can be - determined easily and without the overhead of transferring the entire - resource.
- -Secondly, conditional requests are usually less strenuous on the
- backend. For static files, typically all that is involved is a call
- to stat()
or similar system call, to see if the file has
- changed in size or modification time. As such, even if httpd is
- caching local content, even expired content may still be served faster
- from the cache if it has not changed. As long as reading from the cache
- store is faster than reading from the backend (e.g. mod_cache_disk
with memory disk
- compared to reading from disk).
When content expires from the cache and becomes stale, rather than + pass on the original request, httpd will modify the request to make + it conditional instead.
+ +When an ETag
header exists in the original cached
+ response, mod_cache
will add an
+ If-None-Match
header to the request to the origin server.
+ When a Last-Modified
header exists in the original
+ cached response, mod_cache
will add an
+ If-Modified-Since
header to the request to the origin
+ server. Performing either of these actions makes the request
+ conditional.
When a conditional request is received by an origin server, the + origin server should check whether the ETag or the Last-Modified + parameter has changed, as appropriate for the request. If not, the + origin should respond with a terse "304 Not Modified" response. This + signals to the cache that the stale content is still fresh should be + used for subsequent requests until the content's new freshness lifetime + is reached again.
+ +If the content has changed, then the content is served as if the + request were not conditional to begin with.
+ +Conditional requests offer two benefits. Firstly, when making such + a request to the origin server, if the content from the origin + matches the content in the cache, this can be determined easily and + without the overhead of transferring the entire resource.
+ +Secondly, a well designed origin server will be designed in such
+ a way that conditional requests will be significantly cheaper to
+ produce than a full response. For static files, typically all that is
+ involved is a call to stat()
or similar system call, to
+ see if the file has changed in size or modification time. As such, even
+ local content may still be served faster from the cache if it has not
+ changed.
Origin servers should make every effort to support conditional + requests as is practical, however if conditional requests are not + supported, the origin will respond as if the request was not + conditional, and the cache will respond as if the content had changed + and save the new content to the cache. In this case, the cache will + behave like a simple two state cache, where content is effectively + either fresh or deleted.
As mentioned already, the two styles of caching in httpd work
- differently, mod_file_cache
caching maintains file
- contents as they were when httpd was started. When a request is
- made for a file that is cached by this module, it is intercepted
- and the cached file is served.
mod_cache
caching on the other hand is more
- complex. When serving a request, if it has not been cached
- previously, the caching module will determine if the content
- is cacheable. The conditions for determining cachability of
- a response are;
The full definition of which responses can be cached by an HTTP + cache is defined in + + RFC2616 Section 13.4 Response Cacheability, and can be summed up as + follows:
CacheEnable
and CacheDisable
directives.In short, any content which is highly time-sensitive, or which varies - depending on the particulars of the request that are not covered by - HTTP negotiation, should not be cached.
+It should be up to the client creating the request, or the origin
+ server constructing the response to decide whether or not the content
+ should be cacheable or not by correctly setting the
+ Cache-Control
header, and mod_cache
should
+ be left alone to honor the wishes of the client or server as appropriate.
+
If you have dynamic content which changes depending on the IP address - of the requester, or changes every 5 minutes, it should almost certainly - not be cached.
+Content that is time sensitive, or which varies depending on the
+ particulars of the request that are not covered by HTTP negotiation,
+ should not be cached. This content should declare itself uncacheable
+ using the Cache-Control
header.
If content changes often, expressed by a freshness lifetime of minutes + or seconds, the content can still be cached, however it is highly + desirable that the origin server supports + conditional requests correctly to ensure that + full responses do not have to be generated on a regular basis.
+ +Content that varies based on client provided request headers can be
+ cached through intelligent use of the Vary
response
+ header.
If on the other hand, the content served differs depending on the - values of various HTTP headers, it might be possible - to cache it intelligently through the use of a "Vary" header.
If a response with a "Vary" header is received by
- mod_cache
when requesting content by the backend it
- will attempt to handle it intelligently. If possible,
- mod_cache
will detect the headers attributed in the
- "Vary" response in future requests and serve the correct cached
- response.
When the origin server is designed to respond with different content + based on the value of headers in the request, for example to serve + multiple languages at the same URL, HTTP's caching mechanism makes it + possible to cache multiple variants of the same page at the same URL.
+ +This is done by the origin server adding a Vary
header
+ to indicate which headers must be taken into account by a cache when
+ determining whether two variants are different from one another.
If for example, a response is received with a vary header such as;
@@ -295,244 +402,36 @@ Vary: negotiate,accept-language,accept-charsetmod_cache
will only serve the cached content to
requesters with accept-language and accept-charset headers
matching those of the original request.
Using mod_cache
is very much like having a built
- in reverse-proxy. Requests will be served by the caching module unless
- it determines that the backend should be queried. When caching local
- resources, this drastically changes the security model of httpd.
As traversing a filesystem hierarchy to examine potential
- .htaccess
files would be a very expensive operation,
- partially defeating the point of caching (to speed up requests),
- mod_cache
makes no decision about whether a cached
- entity is authorised for serving. In other words; if
- mod_cache
has cached some content, it will be served
- from the cache as long as that content has not expired.
If, for example, your configuration permits access to a resource by IP
- address you should ensure that this content is not cached. You can do this
- by using the CacheDisable
- directive, or mod_expires
. Left unchecked,
- mod_cache
- very much like a reverse proxy - would cache
- the content when served and then serve it to any client, on any IP
- address.
Multiple variants of the content can be cached side by side,
+ mod_cache
uses the Vary
header and the
+ corresponding values of the request headers listed by Vary
+ to decide on which of many variants to return to the client.
As requests to end-users can be served from the cache, the cache - itself can become a target for those wishing to deface or interfere with - content. It is important to bear in mind that the cache must at all - times be writable by the user which httpd is running as. This is in - stark contrast to the usually recommended situation of maintaining - all content unwritable by the Apache user.
- -If the Apache user is compromised, for example through a flaw in
- a CGI process, it is possible that the cache may be targeted. When
- using mod_cache_disk
, it is relatively easy to
- insert or modify a cached entity.
This presents a somewhat elevated risk in comparison to the other
- types of attack it is possible to make as the Apache user. If you are
- using mod_cache_disk
you should bear this in mind -
- ensure you upgrade httpd when security upgrades are announced and
- run CGI processes as a non-Apache user using suEXEC if possible.
The mod_cache
module relies on specific backend store
+ implementations in order to manage the cache, and for caching to disk
+ mod_cache_disk
is provided to support this.
When running httpd as a caching proxy server, there is also the - potential for so-called cache poisoning. Cache Poisoning is a broad - term for attacks in which an attacker causes the proxy server to - retrieve incorrect (and usually undesirable) content from the backend. -
- -For example if the DNS servers used by your system running - httpd - are vulnerable to DNS cache poisoning, an attacker may be able to control - where httpd connects to when requesting content from the origin server. - Another example is so-called HTTP request-smuggling attacks.
- -This document is not the correct place for an in-depth discussion - of HTTP request smuggling (instead, try your favourite search engine) - however it is important to be aware that it is possible to make - a series of requests, and to exploit a vulnerability on an origin - webserver such that the attacker can entirely control the content - retrieved by the proxy.
- -Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
The act of opening a file can itself be a source of delay, particularly - on network filesystems. By maintaining a cache of open file descriptors - for commonly served files, httpd can avoid this delay. Currently - httpd - provides one implementation of File-Handle Caching.
- -The most basic form of caching present in httpd is the file-handle
- caching provided by mod_file_cache
. Rather than caching
- file-contents, this cache maintains a table of open file descriptors. Files
- to be cached in this manner are specified in the configuration file using
- the CacheFile
- directive.
The
- CacheFile
directive
- instructs httpd to open the file when it is started and to re-use
- this file-handle for all subsequent access to this file.
- CacheFile /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/index.html
-
If you intend to cache a large number of files in this manner, you - must ensure that your operating system's limit for the number of open - files is set appropriately.
- -Although using CacheFile
- does not cause the file-contents to be cached per-se, it does mean
- that if the file changes while httpd is running these changes will
- not be picked up. The file will be consistently served as it was
- when httpd was started.
If the file is removed while httpd is running, it will continue - to maintain an open file descriptor and serve the file as it was when - httpd was started. This usually also means that although the file - will have been deleted, and not show up on the filesystem, extra free - space will not be recovered until httpd is stopped and the file - descriptor closed.
- - -Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
Serving directly from system memory is universally the fastest method - of serving content. Reading files from a disk controller or, even worse, - from a remote network is orders of magnitude slower. Disk controllers - usually involve physical processes, and network access is limited by - your available bandwidth. Memory access on the other hand can take mere - nano-seconds.
- -System memory isn't cheap though, byte for byte it's by far the most - expensive type of storage and it's important to ensure that it is used - efficiently. By caching files in memory you decrease the amount of - memory available on the system. As we'll see, in the case of operating - system caching, this is not so much of an issue, but when using - httpd's own in-memory caching it is important to make sure that you - do not allocate too much memory to a cache. Otherwise the system - will be forced to swap out memory, which will likely degrade - performance.
- -Almost all modern operating systems cache file-data in memory managed - directly by the kernel. This is a powerful feature, and for the most - part operating systems get it right. For example, on Linux, let's look at - the difference in the time it takes to read a file for the first time - and the second time;
- --colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null -real 0m0.065s -user 0m0.000s -sys 0m0.001s -colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null -real 0m0.003s -user 0m0.003s -sys 0m0.000s
Even for this small file, there is a huge difference in the amount - of time it takes to read the file. This is because the kernel has cached - the file contents in memory.
- -By ensuring there is "spare" memory on your system, you can ensure - that more and more file-contents will be stored in this cache. This - can be a very efficient means of in-memory caching, and involves no - extra configuration of httpd at all.
- -Additionally, because the operating system knows when files are - deleted or modified, it can automatically remove file contents from the - cache when necessary. This is a big advantage over httpd's in-memory - caching which has no way of knowing when a file has changed.
- - -Despite the performance and advantages of automatic operating system - caching there are some circumstances in which in-memory caching may be - better performed by httpd.
- -mod_file_cache
provides the
- MMapFile
directive, which
- allows you to have httpd map a static file's contents into memory at
- start time (using the mmap system call). httpd will use the in-memory
- contents for all subsequent accesses to this file.
Typically the module will be configured as so;
- MMapFile /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/index.html
-
As with the
- CacheFile
directive, any
- changes in these files will not be picked up by httpd after it has
- started.
The MMapFile
- directive does not keep track of how much memory it allocates, so
- you must ensure not to over-use the directive. Each httpd child
- process will replicate this memory, so it is critically important
- to ensure that the files mapped are not so large as to cause the
- system to swap memory.
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
mod_cache_disk
provides a disk-based caching mechanism
- for mod_cache
. This cache is intelligent and content will
- be served from the cache only as long as it is considered valid.
Typically the module will be configured as so;
- -
CacheRoot /var/cache/apache/
CacheEnable disk /
CacheDirLevels 2
CacheDirLength 1
-
Importantly, as the cached files are locally stored, operating system + in-memory caching will typically be applied to their access also. So + although the files are stored on disk, if they are frequently accessed + it is likely the operating system will ensure that they are actually + served from memory.
-Importantly, as the cached files are locally stored, operating system - in-memory caching will typically be applied to their access also. So - although the files are stored on disk, if they are frequently accessed - it is likely the operating system will ensure that they are actually - served from memory.
+To store items in the cache, mod_cache_disk
creates
a 22 character hash of the URL being requested. This hash incorporates
the hostname, protocol, port, path and any CGI arguments to the URL,
- to ensure that multiple URLs do not collide.
Each character may be any one of 64-different characters, which mean that overall there are 64^22 possible hashes. For example, a URL might @@ -592,13 +492,13 @@ CacheDirLength 1
Although mod_cache_disk
will remove cached content
- as it is expired, it does not maintain any information on the total
- size of the cache or how little free space may be left.
The mod_cache_disk
module makes no attempt to
+ regulate the amount of disk space used by the cache, although it
+ will gracefully stand down on any disk error and behave as if the
+ cache was never present.
Instead, provided with httpd is the htcacheclean tool which, as the name - suggests, allows you to clean the cache periodically. Determining - how frequently to run htcacheclean and what target size to +
Instead, provided with httpd is the htcacheclean tool which allows you + to clean the cache periodically. Determining how frequently to run htcacheclean and what target size to use for the cache is somewhat complex and trial and error may be needed to select optimal values.
@@ -608,6 +508,10 @@ CacheDirLength 1 or more to process very large (tens of gigabytes) caches and if you are running it from cron it is recommended that you determine how long a typical run takes, to avoid running more than one instance at a time. + +It is also recommended that an appropriate "nice" level is chosen for + htcacheclean so that the tool does not cause excessive disk io while the + server is running.
@@ -620,6 +524,307 @@ CacheDirLength 1
leave enough "grow room" following a clean.
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
The Apache HTTP server offers a low level shared object cache for + caching information such as SSL sessions, or authentication credentials, + within the socache interface.
+ +Additional modules are provided for each implementation, offering the + following backends:
+ +mod_socache_dbm
mod_socache_dc
mod_socache_memcache
mod_socache_shmcb
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
The mod_authn_socache
module allows the result of
+ authentication to be cached, relieving load on authentication backends.
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
The mod_ssl
module uses the socache
interface
+ to provide a session cache and a stapling cache.
Related Modules | Related Directives |
---|---|
On platforms where a filesystem might be slow, or where file + handles are expensive, the option exists to pre-load files into + memory on startup.
+ +On systems where opening files is slow, the option exists to + open the file on startup and cache the file handle. These + options can help on systems where access to static files is + slow.
+ +The act of opening a file can itself be a source of delay, particularly + on network filesystems. By maintaining a cache of open file descriptors + for commonly served files, httpd can avoid this delay. Currently httpd + provides one implementation of File-Handle Caching.
+ +The most basic form of caching present in httpd is the file-handle
+ caching provided by mod_file_cache
. Rather than caching
+ file-contents, this cache maintains a table of open file descriptors. Files
+ to be cached in this manner are specified in the configuration file using
+ the CacheFile
+ directive.
The
+ CacheFile
directive
+ instructs httpd to open the file when it is started and to re-use
+ this file-handle for all subsequent access to this file.
+ CacheFile /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/index.html
+
If you intend to cache a large number of files in this manner, you + must ensure that your operating system's limit for the number of open + files is set appropriately.
+ +Although using CacheFile
+ does not cause the file-contents to be cached per-se, it does mean
+ that if the file changes while httpd is running these changes will
+ not be picked up. The file will be consistently served as it was
+ when httpd was started.
If the file is removed while httpd is running, it will continue + to maintain an open file descriptor and serve the file as it was when + httpd was started. This usually also means that although the file + will have been deleted, and not show up on the filesystem, extra free + space will not be recovered until httpd is stopped and the file + descriptor closed.
+ + + + +Serving directly from system memory is universally the fastest method + of serving content. Reading files from a disk controller or, even worse, + from a remote network is orders of magnitude slower. Disk controllers + usually involve physical processes, and network access is limited by + your available bandwidth. Memory access on the other hand can take mere + nano-seconds.
+ +System memory isn't cheap though, byte for byte it's by far the most + expensive type of storage and it's important to ensure that it is used + efficiently. By caching files in memory you decrease the amount of + memory available on the system. As we'll see, in the case of operating + system caching, this is not so much of an issue, but when using + httpd's own in-memory caching it is important to make sure that you + do not allocate too much memory to a cache. Otherwise the system + will be forced to swap out memory, which will likely degrade + performance.
+ +Almost all modern operating systems cache file-data in memory managed + directly by the kernel. This is a powerful feature, and for the most + part operating systems get it right. For example, on Linux, let's look at + the difference in the time it takes to read a file for the first time + and the second time;
+ ++colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null +real 0m0.065s +user 0m0.000s +sys 0m0.001s +colm@coroebus:~$ time cat testfile > /dev/null +real 0m0.003s +user 0m0.003s +sys 0m0.000s
Even for this small file, there is a huge difference in the amount + of time it takes to read the file. This is because the kernel has cached + the file contents in memory.
+ +By ensuring there is "spare" memory on your system, you can ensure + that more and more file-contents will be stored in this cache. This + can be a very efficient means of in-memory caching, and involves no + extra configuration of httpd at all.
+ +Additionally, because the operating system knows when files are + deleted or modified, it can automatically remove file contents from the + cache when necessary. This is a big advantage over httpd's in-memory + caching which has no way of knowing when a file has changed.
+ + +Despite the performance and advantages of automatic operating system + caching there are some circumstances in which in-memory caching may be + better performed by httpd.
+ +mod_file_cache
provides the
+ MMapFile
directive, which
+ allows you to have httpd map a static file's contents into memory at
+ start time (using the mmap system call). httpd will use the in-memory
+ contents for all subsequent accesses to this file.
+ MMapFile /usr/local/apache2/htdocs/index.html
+
As with the
+ CacheFile
directive, any
+ changes in these files will not be picked up by httpd after it has
+ started.
The MMapFile
+ directive does not keep track of how much memory it allocates, so
+ you must ensure not to over-use the directive. Each httpd child
+ process will replicate this memory, so it is critically important
+ to ensure that the files mapped are not so large as to cause the
+ system to swap memory.
Using mod_cache
in its default state where
+ CacheQuickHandler
is set to
+ On
is very much like having a caching reverse-proxy bolted
+ to the front of the server. Requests will be served by the caching module
+ unless it determines that the origin server should be queried just as an
+ external cache would, and this drastically changes the security model of
+ httpd.
As traversing a filesystem hierarchy to examine potential
+ .htaccess
files would be a very expensive operation,
+ partially defeating the point of caching (to speed up requests),
+ mod_cache
makes no decision about whether a cached
+ entity is authorised for serving. In other words; if
+ mod_cache
has cached some content, it will be served
+ from the cache as long as that content has not expired.
If, for example, your configuration permits access to a resource by IP
+ address you should ensure that this content is not cached. You can do this
+ by using the CacheDisable
+ directive, or mod_expires
. Left unchecked,
+ mod_cache
- very much like a reverse proxy - would cache
+ the content when served and then serve it to any client, on any IP
+ address.
When the CacheQuickHandler
+ directive is set to Off
, the full set of request processing
+ phases are executed and the security model remains unchanged.
As requests to end-users can be served from the cache, the cache + itself can become a target for those wishing to deface or interfere with + content. It is important to bear in mind that the cache must at all + times be writable by the user which httpd is running as. This is in + stark contrast to the usually recommended situation of maintaining + all content unwritable by the Apache user.
+ +If the Apache user is compromised, for example through a flaw in
+ a CGI process, it is possible that the cache may be targeted. When
+ using mod_cache_disk
, it is relatively easy to
+ insert or modify a cached entity.
This presents a somewhat elevated risk in comparison to the other
+ types of attack it is possible to make as the Apache user. If you are
+ using mod_cache_disk
you should bear this in mind -
+ ensure you upgrade httpd when security upgrades are announced and
+ run CGI processes as a non-Apache user using suEXEC if possible.
When running httpd as a caching proxy server, there is also the + potential for so-called cache poisoning. Cache Poisoning is a broad + term for attacks in which an attacker causes the proxy server to + retrieve incorrect (and usually undesirable) content from the origin + server.
+ +For example if the DNS servers used by your system running httpd + are vulnerable to DNS cache poisoning, an attacker may be able to control + where httpd connects to when requesting content from the origin server. + Another example is so-called HTTP request-smuggling attacks.
+ +This document is not the correct place for an in-depth discussion + of HTTP request smuggling (instead, try your favourite search engine) + however it is important to be aware that it is possible to make + a series of requests, and to exploit a vulnerability on an origin + webserver such that the attacker can entirely control the content + retrieved by the proxy.
+ + +The Vary mechanism allows multiple variants of the same URL to be
+ cached side by side. Depending on header values provided by the client,
+ the cache will select the correct variant to return to the client. This
+ mechanism can become a problem when an attempt is made to vary on a
+ header that is known to contain a wide range of possible values under
+ normal use, for example the User-Agent
header. Depending
+ on the popularity of the particular web site thousands or millions of
+ duplicate cache entries could be created for the same URL, crowding
+ out other entries in the cache.
In other cases, there may be a need to change the URL of a particular
+ resource on every request, usually by adding a "cachebuster" string to
+ the URL. If this content is declared cacheable by a server for a
+ significant freshness lifetime, these entries can crowd out
+ legitimate entries in a cache. While mod_cache
+ provides a
+ CacheIgnoreURLSessionIdentifiers
+ directive, this directive should be used with care to ensure that
+ downstream proxy or browser caches aren't subjected to the same denial
+ of service issue.
Available Languages: en | diff --git a/docs/manual/caching.xml.tr b/docs/manual/caching.xml.tr index 5dad23fba9..fe37d1565c 100644 --- a/docs/manual/caching.xml.tr +++ b/docs/manual/caching.xml.tr @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ - +