From: Francis Visoiu Mistrih Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:46:15 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [CodeGen] Ignore return sext/zext attributes of unused results for tail calls X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=849dd13009b66470ad83e54dc5644003b8320145;p=llvm [CodeGen] Ignore return sext/zext attributes of unused results for tail calls If the caller's return type does not have a zeroext attribute but the callee does a tail call zeroext, we won't consider the tail call during CodeGenPrepare because the attributes don't match. However, if the result of the tail call has no uses, it makes sense to drop the sext/zext attributes. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56486 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@350753 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/Analysis.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/Analysis.cpp index 27dce7fd7b7..797f05ee5cf 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/Analysis.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/Analysis.cpp @@ -546,6 +546,21 @@ bool llvm::attributesPermitTailCall(const Function *F, const Instruction *I, CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::SExt); } + // Drop sext and zext return attributes if the result is not used. + // This enables tail calls for code like: + // + // define void @caller() { + // entry: + // %unused_result = tail call zeroext i1 @callee() + // br label %retlabel + // retlabel: + // ret void + // } + if (I->use_empty()) { + CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::SExt); + CalleeAttrs.removeAttribute(Attribute::ZExt); + } + // If they're still different, there's some facet we don't understand // (currently only "inreg", but in future who knows). It may be OK but the // only safe option is to reject the tail call. diff --git a/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tail-call-unused-zext.ll b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tail-call-unused-zext.ll new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1617d13f7e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/AArch64/tail-call-unused-zext.ll @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +; RUN: llc -mtriple=arm64--- -stop-after=expand-isel-pseudos -o - %s | FileCheck %s + +; Check that we ignore the zeroext attribute on the return type of the tail +; call, since the return value is unused. This happens during CodeGenPrepare in +; dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts, which calls attributesPermitTailCall to check if +; the attributes of the caller and the callee match. + +declare zeroext i1 @zcallee() +define void @zcaller() { +; CHECK-LABEL: name: zcaller +entry: + br i1 undef, label %calllabel, label %retlabel +calllabel: +; CHECK: bb.1.calllabel: +; CHECK-NOT: BL @zcallee +; CHECK-NEXT: TCRETURNdi @zcallee + %unused_result = tail call zeroext i1 @zcallee() + br label %retlabel +retlabel: + ret void +} + +declare signext i1 @scallee() +define void @scaller() { +; CHECK-LABEL: name: scaller +entry: + br i1 undef, label %calllabel, label %retlabel +calllabel: +; CHECK: bb.1.calllabel: +; CHECK-NOT: BL @scallee +; CHECK-NEXT: TCRETURNdi @scallee + %unused_result = tail call signext i1 @scallee() + br label %retlabel +retlabel: + ret void +}