From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:56:35 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Fix bug in the new wait-until-lwlock-is-free mechanism. X-Git-Tag: REL9_2_BETA1~497 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=82d4b262d9614958da38003cdc9d56915d9bcda0;p=postgresql Fix bug in the new wait-until-lwlock-is-free mechanism. If there was a wait-until-free process in the head of the wait queue, followed by an exclusive locker, the exclusive locker was not be woken up as it should. --- diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c index bee35b8c1c..6511faf985 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c @@ -754,23 +754,31 @@ LWLockRelease(LWLockId lockid) if (lock->exclusive == 0 && lock->shared == 0 && lock->releaseOK) { /* - * Remove the to-be-awakened PGPROCs from the queue. If the front - * waiter wants exclusive lock, awaken him only. Otherwise awaken - * as many waiters as want shared access (or just want to be - * woken up when the lock becomes free without acquiring it, - * ie. LWLockWaitUntilFree). + * Remove the to-be-awakened PGPROCs from the queue. */ bool releaseOK = true; proc = head; + + /* + * First wake up any backends that want to be woken up without + * acquiring the lock. + */ + while (proc->lwWaitMode == LW_WAIT_UNTIL_FREE && proc->lwWaitLink) + proc = proc->lwWaitLink; + + /* + * If the front waiter wants exclusive lock, awaken him only. + * Otherwise awaken as many waiters as want shared access. + */ if (proc->lwWaitMode != LW_EXCLUSIVE) { while (proc->lwWaitLink != NULL && proc->lwWaitLink->lwWaitMode != LW_EXCLUSIVE) { - proc = proc->lwWaitLink; if (proc->lwWaitMode != LW_WAIT_UNTIL_FREE) releaseOK = false; + proc = proc->lwWaitLink; } } /* proc is now the last PGPROC to be released */ @@ -778,9 +786,8 @@ LWLockRelease(LWLockId lockid) proc->lwWaitLink = NULL; /* * Prevent additional wakeups until retryer gets to run. Backends - * that are just waiting for the lock to become free don't prevent - * wakeups, because they might decide that they don't want the - * lock, after all. + * that are just waiting for the lock to become free don't retry + * automatically. */ if (proc->lwWaitMode != LW_WAIT_UNTIL_FREE) releaseOK = false;