From: Tom Lane Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:03:14 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop. X-Git-Tag: REL_10_BETA1~191 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=81069a9efc5a374dd39874a161f456f0fb3afba4;p=postgresql Use pselect(2) not select(2), if available, to wait in postmaster's loop. Traditionally we've unblocked signals, called select(2), and then blocked signals again. The code expects that the select() will be cancelled with EINTR if an interrupt occurs; but there's a race condition, which is that an already-pending signal will be delivered as soon as we unblock, and then when we reach select() there will be nothing preventing it from waiting. This can result in a long delay before we perform any action that ServerLoop was supposed to have taken in response to the signal. As with the somewhat-similar symptoms fixed by commit 893902085, the main practical problem is slow launching of parallel workers. The window for trouble is usually pretty short, corresponding to one iteration of ServerLoop; but it's not negligible. To fix, use pselect(2) in place of select(2) where available, as that's designed to solve exactly this problem. Where not available, we continue to use the old way, and are no worse off than before. pselect(2) has been required by POSIX since about 2001, so most modern platforms should have it. A bigger portability issue is that some implementations are said to be non-atomic, ie pselect() isn't really any different from unblock/select/reblock. Still, we're no worse off than before on such a platform. There is talk of rewriting the postmaster to use a WaitEventSet and not do signal response work in signal handlers, at which point this could be reverted, since we'd be using a self-pipe to solve the race condition. But that's not happening before v11 at the earliest. Back-patch to 9.6. The problem exists much further back, but the worst symptom arises only in connection with parallel query, so it does not seem worth taking any portability risks in older branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9205.1492833041@sss.pgh.pa.us --- diff --git a/configure b/configure index 7c86be3c3d..a1d6081b96 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -12892,7 +12892,7 @@ fi LIBS_including_readline="$LIBS" LIBS=`echo "$LIBS" | sed -e 's/-ledit//g' -e 's/-lreadline//g'` -for ac_func in cbrt clock_gettime dlopen fdatasync getifaddrs getpeerucred getrlimit mbstowcs_l memmove poll pstat pthread_is_threaded_np readlink setproctitle setsid shm_open symlink sync_file_range towlower utime utimes wcstombs wcstombs_l +for ac_func in cbrt clock_gettime dlopen fdatasync getifaddrs getpeerucred getrlimit mbstowcs_l memmove poll pselect pstat pthread_is_threaded_np readlink setproctitle setsid shm_open symlink sync_file_range towlower utime utimes wcstombs wcstombs_l do : as_ac_var=`$as_echo "ac_cv_func_$ac_func" | $as_tr_sh` ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "$ac_func" "$as_ac_var" diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index e92494e12d..83e53618e6 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -1429,7 +1429,7 @@ PGAC_FUNC_WCSTOMBS_L LIBS_including_readline="$LIBS" LIBS=`echo "$LIBS" | sed -e 's/-ledit//g' -e 's/-lreadline//g'` -AC_CHECK_FUNCS([cbrt clock_gettime dlopen fdatasync getifaddrs getpeerucred getrlimit mbstowcs_l memmove poll pstat pthread_is_threaded_np readlink setproctitle setsid shm_open symlink sync_file_range towlower utime utimes wcstombs wcstombs_l]) +AC_CHECK_FUNCS([cbrt clock_gettime dlopen fdatasync getifaddrs getpeerucred getrlimit mbstowcs_l memmove poll pselect pstat pthread_is_threaded_np readlink setproctitle setsid shm_open symlink sync_file_range towlower utime utimes wcstombs wcstombs_l]) AC_REPLACE_FUNCS(fseeko) case $host_os in diff --git a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c index 2bb4380533..7b9f444dc1 100644 --- a/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c +++ b/src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c @@ -614,9 +614,9 @@ PostmasterMain(int argc, char *argv[]) * In the postmaster, we want to install non-ignored handlers *without* * SA_RESTART. This is because they'll be blocked at all times except * when ServerLoop is waiting for something to happen, and during that - * window, we want signals to exit the select(2) wait so that ServerLoop + * window, we want signals to exit the pselect(2) wait so that ServerLoop * can respond if anything interesting happened. On some platforms, - * signals marked SA_RESTART would not cause the select() wait to end. + * signals marked SA_RESTART would not cause the pselect() wait to end. * Child processes will generally want SA_RESTART, but we expect them to * set up their own handlers before unblocking signals. * @@ -1670,6 +1670,8 @@ ServerLoop(void) for (;;) { fd_set rmask; + fd_set *rmask_p; + struct timeval timeout; int selres; time_t now; @@ -1679,37 +1681,64 @@ ServerLoop(void) * We block all signals except while sleeping. That makes it safe for * signal handlers, which again block all signals while executing, to * do nontrivial work. - * - * If we are in PM_WAIT_DEAD_END state, then we don't want to accept - * any new connections, so we don't call select(), and just sleep. */ - memcpy((char *) &rmask, (char *) &readmask, sizeof(fd_set)); - if (pmState == PM_WAIT_DEAD_END) { - PG_SETMASK(&UnBlockSig); - - pg_usleep(100000L); /* 100 msec seems reasonable */ - selres = 0; - - PG_SETMASK(&BlockSig); + /* + * If we are in PM_WAIT_DEAD_END state, then we don't want to + * accept any new connections, so pass a null rmask. + */ + rmask_p = NULL; + timeout.tv_sec = 0; + timeout.tv_usec = 100000; /* 100 msec seems reasonable */ } else { - /* must set timeout each time; some OSes change it! */ - struct timeval timeout; + /* Normal case: check sockets, and compute a suitable timeout */ + memcpy(&rmask, &readmask, sizeof(fd_set)); + rmask_p = &rmask; /* Needs to run with blocked signals! */ DetermineSleepTime(&timeout); + } + /* + * We prefer to wait with pselect(2) if available, as using that, + * together with *not* using SA_RESTART for signals, guarantees that + * we will get kicked off the wait if a signal occurs. + * + * If we lack pselect(2), fake it with select(2). This has a race + * condition: a signal that was already pending will be delivered + * before we reach the select(), and therefore the select() will wait, + * even though we might wish to do something in response. Therefore, + * beware of putting any time-critical signal response logic into + * ServerLoop rather than into the signal handler itself. It will run + * eventually, but maybe not till after a timeout delay. + * + * Some implementations of pselect() are reportedly not atomic, making + * the first alternative here functionally equivalent to the second. + * Not much we can do about that though. + */ + { +#ifdef HAVE_PSELECT + /* pselect uses a randomly different timeout API, sigh */ + struct timespec ptimeout; + + ptimeout.tv_sec = timeout.tv_sec; + ptimeout.tv_nsec = timeout.tv_usec * 1000; + + selres = pselect(nSockets, rmask_p, NULL, NULL, + &ptimeout, &UnBlockSig); +#else PG_SETMASK(&UnBlockSig); - selres = select(nSockets, &rmask, NULL, NULL, &timeout); + selres = select(nSockets, rmask_p, NULL, NULL, &timeout); PG_SETMASK(&BlockSig); +#endif } - /* Now check the select() result */ + /* Now check the select()/pselect() result */ if (selres < 0) { if (errno != EINTR && errno != EWOULDBLOCK) diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.in b/src/include/pg_config.h.in index 7a05c7e5b8..75e511cfb6 100644 --- a/src/include/pg_config.h.in +++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.in @@ -400,6 +400,9 @@ /* Define to 1 if the assembler supports PPC's LWARX mutex hint bit. */ #undef HAVE_PPC_LWARX_MUTEX_HINT +/* Define to 1 if you have the `pselect' function. */ +#undef HAVE_PSELECT + /* Define to 1 if you have the `pstat' function. */ #undef HAVE_PSTAT diff --git a/src/include/pg_config.h.win32 b/src/include/pg_config.h.win32 index 2a5fc1bab7..91d8f61edf 100644 --- a/src/include/pg_config.h.win32 +++ b/src/include/pg_config.h.win32 @@ -267,6 +267,9 @@ /* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */ /* #undef HAVE_POLL_H */ +/* Define to 1 if you have the `pselect' function. */ +/* #undef HAVE_PSELECT */ + /* Define to 1 if you have the `pstat' function. */ /* #undef HAVE_PSTAT */