From: Artem Dergachev <artem.dergachev@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:44:02 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: [analyzer] Treat throws as sinks for suppress-on-sink purposes.
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7c823a91d83e273cc09979528b2dd0e1233dfbef;p=clang

[analyzer] Treat throws as sinks for suppress-on-sink purposes.

Because since r308957 the suppress-on-sink feature contains its own
mini-analysis, it also needs to become aware that C++ unhandled exceptions
cause sinks. Unfortunately, for now we treat all exceptions as unhandled in
the analyzer, so suppress-on-sink needs to do the same.

rdar://problem/28157554

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35674


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@308961 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp
index a306462605..9a30bca6f9 100644
--- a/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp
+++ b/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp
@@ -3310,13 +3310,34 @@ static const CFGBlock *findBlockForNode(const ExplodedNode *N) {
   return nullptr;
 }
 
+static bool isNoReturnBlock(const CFGBlock *Blk) {
+  if (Blk->hasNoReturnElement())
+    return true;
+
+  // FIXME: Throw-expressions are currently generating sinks during analysis:
+  // they're not supported yet, and also often used for actually terminating
+  // the program. So we should treat them as sinks in this analysis as well,
+  // at least for now, but once we have better support for exceptions,
+  // we'd need to carefully handle the case when the throw is being
+  // immediately caught.
+  if (std::any_of(Blk->begin(), Blk->end(), [](const CFGElement &Elm) {
+        if (Optional<CFGStmt> StmtElm = Elm.getAs<CFGStmt>())
+          if (isa<CXXThrowExpr>(StmtElm->getStmt()))
+            return true;
+        return false;
+      }))
+    return true;
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 static bool isDominatedByNoReturnBlocks(const ExplodedNode *N) {
   const CFG &Cfg = N->getCFG();
 
   const CFGBlock *StartBlk = findBlockForNode(N);
   if (!StartBlk)
     return false;
-  if (StartBlk->hasNoReturnElement())
+  if (isNoReturnBlock(StartBlk))
     return true;
 
   llvm::SmallVector<const CFGBlock *, 32> DFSWorkList;
@@ -3336,7 +3357,7 @@ static bool isDominatedByNoReturnBlocks(const ExplodedNode *N) {
           return false;
         }
 
-        if (!SuccBlk->hasNoReturnElement() && !Visited.count(SuccBlk)) {
+        if (!isNoReturnBlock(SuccBlk) && !Visited.count(SuccBlk)) {
           // If the block has reachable child blocks that aren't no-return,
           // add them to the worklist.
           DFSWorkList.push_back(SuccBlk);
diff --git a/test/Analysis/max-nodes-suppress-on-sink.cpp b/test/Analysis/max-nodes-suppress-on-sink.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..814b302789
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Analysis/max-nodes-suppress-on-sink.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -x c++ -fcxx-exceptions -analyzer-checker=core,unix.Malloc,debug.ExprInspection -analyzer-config max-nodes=12 -verify %s
+
+// Here we test how "suppress on sink" feature of certain bugtypes interacts
+// with reaching analysis limits. See comments in max-nodes-suppress-on-sink.c
+// for more discussion.
+
+typedef __typeof(sizeof(int)) size_t;
+void *malloc(size_t);
+
+void clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(void);
+
+// Because we don't have a better approach, we currently treat throw as
+// noreturn.
+void test_throw_treated_as_noreturn() {
+  void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning
+
+  clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
+  clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning
+
+  throw 0;
+}
+
+// FIXME: Handled throws shouldn't be suppressing us!
+void test_handled_throw_treated_as_noreturn() {
+  void *p = malloc(1); // no-warning
+
+  clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
+  clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning
+
+  try {
+    throw 0;
+  } catch (int i) {
+  }
+}