From: Reid Kleckner Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 18:22:25 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording. X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7a9b46c6c7524cc381adbdeaac7f33c928239043;p=clang Fix MSVCCompatibility doc ReST and wording. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@202732 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst b/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst index 346b860e76..879bb3de16 100644 --- a/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst +++ b/docs/MSVCCompatibility.rst @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ ABI features The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: -* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've attacked this with a fuzzer, - and most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, +* Record layout: :good:`Mostly complete`. We've tested this with a fuzzer, and + most of the remaining failures involve ``#pragma pack``, ``__declspec(align(N))``, or other pragmas. * Class inheritance: :good:`Mostly complete`. This covers all of the standard @@ -96,8 +96,8 @@ The status of major ABI-impacting C++ features: Template instantiation and name lookup ====================================== -In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs `_, Clang is often unable -to parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, +In addition to the usual `dependent name lookup FAQs`_, Clang is often unable to +parse certain invalid C++ constructs that MSVC allows. As of this writing, Clang will reject code with missing ``typename`` annotations: .. _dependent name lookup FAQs: