From: Timur Iskhodzhanov Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 17:08:06 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Fix PR20479 -- missing vftable slots in case of virtual inheritance vs return adjusti... X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7948cb33f7119606876f9e4fa1320079760bf455;p=clang Fix PR20479 -- missing vftable slots in case of virtual inheritance vs return adjusting thunks Reviewed at http://reviews.llvm.org/D4829 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@215285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp b/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp index fa1127f58f..42fafde4a5 100644 --- a/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp +++ b/lib/AST/VTableBuilder.cpp @@ -3174,9 +3174,16 @@ void MicrosoftVTableContext::computeVTablePaths(bool ForVBTables, Paths.push_back(new VPtrInfo(RD)); // Recursive case: get all the vbtables from our bases and remove anything - // that shares a virtual base. + // that shares a virtual base. Look at non-virtual bases first so we get + // longer inheritance paths from the derived class to the virtual bases. + llvm::SmallVector Bases; + std::copy_if(RD->bases_begin(), RD->bases_end(), std::back_inserter(Bases), + [](CXXBaseSpecifier bs) { return !bs.isVirtual(); }); + std::copy_if(RD->bases_begin(), RD->bases_end(), std::back_inserter(Bases), + [](CXXBaseSpecifier bs) { return bs.isVirtual(); }); + llvm::SmallPtrSet VBasesSeen; - for (const auto &B : RD->bases()) { + for (const auto &B : Bases) { const CXXRecordDecl *Base = B.getType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl(); if (B.isVirtual() && VBasesSeen.count(Base)) continue; diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-return-thunks.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-return-thunks.cpp index a4a21106c6..072cb95603 100644 --- a/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-return-thunks.cpp +++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-return-thunks.cpp @@ -104,3 +104,27 @@ K::K() {} // GLOBALS-LABEL: @"\01??_7K@test2@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant [3 x i8*] } + +namespace pr20479 { +struct A { + virtual A *f(); +}; + +struct B : virtual A { + virtual B *f(); +}; + +struct C : virtual A, B { +// VFTABLES-LABEL: VFTable for 'pr20479::A' in 'pr20479::B' in 'pr20479::C' (2 entries). +// VFTABLES-NEXT: 0 | pr20479::B *pr20479::B::f() +// VFTABLES-NEXT: [return adjustment (to type 'struct pr20479::A *'): vbase #1, 0 non-virtual] +// VFTABLES-NEXT: 1 | pr20479::B *pr20479::B::f() + C(); +}; + +C::C() {} + +// GLOBALS-LABEL: @"\01??_7C@pr20479@@6B@" = linkonce_odr unnamed_addr constant [2 x i8*] +// GLOBALS: @"\01?f@B@pr20479@@QAEPAUA@2@XZ" +// GLOBALS: @"\01?f@B@pr20479@@UAEPAU12@XZ" +} diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp index 4ce4e9c2e1..5f0c5050c0 100644 --- a/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp +++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/microsoft-abi-vtables-virtual-inheritance.cpp @@ -573,6 +573,10 @@ struct Q { // PR19172: Yet another diamond we miscompiled. struct R : virtual Q, X { + // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::X' in 'vdtors::R' (2 entries). + // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting] + // CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void vdtors::X::zzz() + // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::Q' in 'vdtors::R' (1 entry). // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting] // CHECK-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual] @@ -580,10 +584,6 @@ struct R : virtual Q, X { // CHECK-LABEL: Thunks for 'vdtors::R::~R()' (1 entry). // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual] - // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'vdtors::X' in 'vdtors::R' (2 entries). - // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting] - // CHECK-NEXT: 1 | void vdtors::X::zzz() - // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable indices for 'vdtors::R' (1 entry). // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | vdtors::R::~R() [scalar deleting] virtual ~R(); @@ -694,10 +694,10 @@ struct X : virtual B {}; struct Y : virtual X, B { Y(); - // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::X' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry). + // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry). // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void B::g() - // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry). + // CHECK-LABEL: VFTable for 'B' in 'pr19066::X' in 'pr19066::Y' (1 entry). // CHECK-NEXT: 0 | void B::g() };