From: Steve Naroff Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:30:18 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Change Expr::isLvalue() to allow the "void" type. This fixes bz2000 submitted by... X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=75ceedf377727cb39a4fbeb36f11462713b093f5;p=clang Change Expr::isLvalue() to allow the "void" type. This fixes bz2000 submitted by Neil Booth. Neil, can you point me to the place in the C99 spec that says this is allowed? I thought Expr::isLvalue() conformed to the spec, which says "C99 6.3.2.1: an lvalue is an expression with an object type or an incomplete type other than void.". Please advise. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@46917 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/AST/Expr.cpp b/AST/Expr.cpp index f02e817f06..f979c7aa7b 100644 --- a/AST/Expr.cpp +++ b/AST/Expr.cpp @@ -357,9 +357,6 @@ Expr::isLvalueResult Expr::isLvalue() const { if (TR->isFunctionType()) // from isObjectType() return LV_NotObjectType; - if (TR->isVoidType()) - return LV_IncompleteVoidType; - if (TR->isReferenceType()) // C++ [expr] return LV_Valid; diff --git a/test/Sema/deref.c b/test/Sema/deref.c index 7441584107..7efb55e720 100644 --- a/test/Sema/deref.c +++ b/test/Sema/deref.c @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ void foo2 (void) void foo3 (void) { void* x = 0; - void* y = &*x; // expected-error {{address expression must be an lvalue or a function designator}} + void* y = &*x; +} + +extern const void cv1; +const void *foo4 (void) +{ + return &cv1; }