From: Argyrios Kyrtzidis Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 00:52:10 +0000 (+0000) Subject: When initializing struct members, the important thing is that the "initializing"... X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=65e7a9e0597fdd68caa23d49991f3891e724e5c6;p=clang When initializing struct members, the important thing is that the "initializing" expression is compatible, not having the same type. Fix rdar://8183908 in which compatible vector types weren't initialized properly leading to a crash. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@124637 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp index 589e971ccb..3aeb518827 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp @@ -697,7 +697,8 @@ void InitListChecker::CheckSubElementType(const InitializedEntity &Entity, // initial value of the object, including unnamed members, is // that of the expression. if ((ElemType->isRecordType() || ElemType->isVectorType()) && - SemaRef.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(expr->getType(), ElemType)) { + SemaRef.CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints(ElemType, expr) + == Sema::Compatible) { SemaRef.DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion(expr); UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex, expr); ++Index; diff --git a/test/CodeGen/struct-init.c b/test/CodeGen/struct-init.c index 926e5a7f5d..861c41e59c 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/struct-init.c +++ b/test/CodeGen/struct-init.c @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm -o - +// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -emit-llvm-only typedef struct _zend_ini_entry zend_ini_entry; struct _zend_ini_entry { @@ -18,3 +18,14 @@ struct GLGENH { }; struct GLGENH ABHFBF = {1}; + +typedef __attribute__(( ext_vector_type(2) )) unsigned int uint2; +typedef __attribute__(( __vector_size__(8) )) unsigned int __neon_uint32x2_t; + +// rdar://8183908 +typedef struct __simd64_uint32_t { + __neon_uint32x2_t val; +} uint32x2_t; +void foo() { + const uint32x2_t signBit = { (uint2) 0x80000000 }; +}