From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:42:50 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: sizeof(x) doesn't require x to be an i-c-e for sizeof to be an i-c-e.  Thanks to... 
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=602dafdea34b78c7bc1f4601f94062afa4139e76;p=clang

sizeof(x) doesn't require x to be an i-c-e for sizeof to be an i-c-e.  Thanks to Neil for pointing this out.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@41338 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/AST/Expr.cpp b/AST/Expr.cpp
index 7397e54ae6..8701b9bb06 100644
--- a/AST/Expr.cpp
+++ b/AST/Expr.cpp
@@ -401,8 +401,8 @@ bool Expr::isIntegerConstantExpr(llvm::APSInt &Result, ASTContext &Ctx,
     
     // Get the operand value.  If this is sizeof/alignof, do not evalute the
     // operand.  This affects C99 6.6p3.
-    if (Exp->isSizeOfAlignOfOp()) isEvaluated = false;
-    if (!Exp->getSubExpr()->isIntegerConstantExpr(Result, Ctx,Loc, isEvaluated))
+    if (!Exp->isSizeOfAlignOfOp() &&
+        !Exp->getSubExpr()->isIntegerConstantExpr(Result, Ctx, Loc,isEvaluated))
       return false;
 
     switch (Exp->getOpcode()) {