From: Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 02:49:08 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Make a note for the C++0x future, when we'll have to revisit the jump-diagnostics... 
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5abbd606200d53f68b57b770ac338c2e9a696abc;p=clang

Make a note for the C++0x future, when we'll have to revisit the jump-diagnostics handling for variables without initializers

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@97929 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp b/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp
index 7cf207f77a..1c761b9503 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/JumpDiagnostics.cpp
@@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ static unsigned GetDiagForGotoScopeDecl(const Decl *D, bool isCPlusPlus) {
       return diag::note_protected_by_cleanup;
     if (VD->hasAttr<BlocksAttr>())
       return diag::note_protected_by___block;
+    // FIXME: In C++0x, we have to check more conditions than "did we
+    // just give it an initializer?". See 6.7p3.
     if (isCPlusPlus && VD->hasLocalStorage() && VD->hasInit())
       return diag::note_protected_by_variable_init;