From: David Bolvansky Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 19:55:50 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [Diagnostics] Warn if enumeration type mismatch in conditional expression X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5a242499d064d920b7ded64b6b070d2abb7fb016;p=clang [Diagnostics] Warn if enumeration type mismatch in conditional expression Summary: - Useful warning - GCC compatibility (GCC warns in C++ mode) Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman Reviewed By: aaron.ballman Subscribers: cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67919 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@373252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp index 28f4e06cd7..7c37932058 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaChecking.cpp @@ -11308,6 +11308,32 @@ static const IntegerLiteral *getIntegerLiteral(Expr *E) { return IL; } +static void CheckConditionalWithEnumTypes(Sema &S, SourceLocation Loc, + Expr *LHS, Expr *RHS) { + QualType LHSStrippedType = LHS->IgnoreParenImpCasts()->getType(); + QualType RHSStrippedType = RHS->IgnoreParenImpCasts()->getType(); + + const auto *LHSEnumType = LHSStrippedType->getAs(); + if (!LHSEnumType) + return; + const auto *RHSEnumType = RHSStrippedType->getAs(); + if (!RHSEnumType) + return; + + // Ignore anonymous enums. + if (!LHSEnumType->getDecl()->hasNameForLinkage()) + return; + if (!RHSEnumType->getDecl()->hasNameForLinkage()) + return; + + if (S.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(LHSStrippedType, RHSStrippedType)) + return; + + S.Diag(Loc, diag::warn_conditional_mixed_enum_types) + << LHSStrippedType << RHSStrippedType << LHS->getSourceRange() + << RHS->getSourceRange(); +} + static void DiagnoseIntInBoolContext(Sema &S, Expr *E) { E = E->IgnoreParenImpCasts(); SourceLocation ExprLoc = E->getExprLoc(); @@ -11799,6 +11825,8 @@ static void CheckConditionalOperator(Sema &S, ConditionalOperator *E, bool Suspicious = false; CheckConditionalOperand(S, E->getTrueExpr(), T, CC, Suspicious); CheckConditionalOperand(S, E->getFalseExpr(), T, CC, Suspicious); + CheckConditionalWithEnumTypes(S, E->getBeginLoc(), E->getTrueExpr(), + E->getFalseExpr()); if (T->isBooleanType()) DiagnoseIntInBoolContext(S, E); diff --git a/test/Sema/warn-conditional-emum-types-mismatch.c b/test/Sema/warn-conditional-emum-types-mismatch.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..4325bb0c41 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/Sema/warn-conditional-emum-types-mismatch.c @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only -verify -Wenum-compare %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only -verify %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -verify -Wenum-compare %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-only -verify %s + +enum ro { A = 0x10 }; +enum rw { B = 0xFF }; +enum { C = 0x1A}; + +enum { + STATUS_SUCCESS, + STATUS_FAILURE, + MAX_BASE_STATUS_CODE +}; + +enum ExtendedStatusCodes { + STATUS_SOMETHING_INTERESTING = MAX_BASE_STATUS_CODE + 1000, +}; + + +int get_flag(int cond) { + return cond ? A : B; + #ifdef __cplusplus + // expected-warning@-2 {{enumeration type mismatch in conditional expression ('ro' and 'rw')}} + #else + // expected-no-diagnostics + #endif +} + +// In the following cases we purposefully differ from GCC and dont warn because +// this code pattern is quite sensitive and we dont want to produce so many false positives. + +int get_flag_anon_enum(int cond) { + return cond ? A : C; +} + +int foo(int c) { + return c ? STATUS_SOMETHING_INTERESTING : STATUS_SUCCESS; +}