From: David Blaikie Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 20:56:17 +0000 (+0000) Subject: DebugInfo: PR19298: function local const variables duplicated in the root scope X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=531ba2d1b9b4728ee5a80c475d9617bf45867bab;p=clang DebugInfo: PR19298: function local const variables duplicated in the root scope See the comment for CodeGenFunction::tryEmitAsConstant that describes how in some contexts (lambdas) we must not emit references to the variable, but instead use the constant directly - because of this we end up emitting a constant for the variable, as well as emitting the variable itself. Should we just skip putting the variable on the stack at all and omit the debug info for the constant? It's not clear to me - what if the address of the local is taken? git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@205651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp index 0e94b51817..41f1ddb697 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/CGDebugInfo.cpp @@ -3227,6 +3227,9 @@ void CGDebugInfo::EmitGlobalVariable(const ValueDecl *VD, // Do not use DIGlobalVariable for enums. if (Ty.getTag() == llvm::dwarf::DW_TAG_enumeration_type) return; + // Do not emit separate definitions for function local const/statics. + if (isa(VD->getDeclContext())) + return; llvm::DIGlobalVariable GV = DBuilder.createStaticVariable( Unit, Name, Name, Unit, getLineNumber(VD->getLocation()), Ty, true, Init, getOrCreateStaticDataMemberDeclarationOrNull(cast(VD))); diff --git a/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info.cpp b/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info.cpp index 2e7226d869..7c89dfc04c 100644 --- a/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info.cpp +++ b/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info.cpp @@ -51,11 +51,6 @@ namespace VirtualBase { } } -void foo() { - const wchar_t c = L'x'; - wchar_t d = c; -} - namespace b5249287 { template class A { struct B; @@ -88,6 +83,13 @@ foo func(foo f) { // CHECK: [[FUNC:![0-9]*]] = {{.*}} metadata !"_ZN7pr147634funcENS_3fooE", i32 {{[0-9]*}}, metadata [[FUNC_TYPE:![0-9]*]], {{.*}} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] {{.*}} [def] [func] } +void foo() { + const wchar_t c = L'x'; + wchar_t d = c; +} + +// CHECK-NOT: ; [ DW_TAG_variable ] [c] + namespace pr9608 { // also pr9600 struct incomplete; incomplete (*x)[3]; @@ -96,9 +98,11 @@ incomplete (*x)[3]; // CHECK: [[INCARRAY]] = {{.*}}metadata !"_ZTSN6pr960810incompleteE", metadata {{![0-9]*}}, i32 0, null, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_array_type ] [line 0, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from _ZTSN6pr960810incompleteE] } -// For some reason the argument for PR14763 ended up all the way down here +// For some reason function arguments ended up down here // CHECK: = metadata !{i32 {{[0-9]*}}, metadata [[FUNC]], {{.*}}, metadata !"[[FOO]]", i32 8192, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_arg_variable ] [f] +// CHECK: ; [ DW_TAG_auto_variable ] [c] + namespace pr16214 { struct a { int i;