From: Hiroshi Inoue <inouehrs@jp.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 05:37:45 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: fix trivial typos in comments; NFC
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=50f735245d0803846df474e9f3229ac7f4d9f9b0;p=clang

fix trivial typos in comments; NFC


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@307123 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index e836135cf2..548a1e24f8 100644
--- a/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -9508,7 +9508,7 @@ bool ComplexExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
   case BO_Mul:
     if (Result.isComplexFloat()) {
       // This is an implementation of complex multiplication according to the
-      // constraints laid out in C11 Annex G. The implemantion uses the
+      // constraints laid out in C11 Annex G. The implemention uses the
       // following naming scheme:
       //   (a + ib) * (c + id)
       ComplexValue LHS = Result;
@@ -9589,7 +9589,7 @@ bool ComplexExprEvaluator::VisitBinaryOperator(const BinaryOperator *E) {
   case BO_Div:
     if (Result.isComplexFloat()) {
       // This is an implementation of complex division according to the
-      // constraints laid out in C11 Annex G. The implemantion uses the
+      // constraints laid out in C11 Annex G. The implemention uses the
       // following naming scheme:
       //   (a + ib) / (c + id)
       ComplexValue LHS = Result;
diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
index d6b70610d4..46f2ba3760 100644
--- a/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
+++ b/lib/Sema/SemaLambda.cpp
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ ExprResult Sema::BuildLambdaExpr(SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc,
                                           ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack);
   // If the lambda expression's call operator is not explicitly marked constexpr
   // and we are not in a dependent context, analyze the call operator to infer
-  // its constexpr-ness, supressing diagnostics while doing so.
+  // its constexpr-ness, suppressing diagnostics while doing so.
   if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus1z && !CallOperator->isInvalidDecl() &&
       !CallOperator->isConstexpr() &&
       !isa<CoroutineBodyStmt>(CallOperator->getBody()) &&