From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:44:37 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: link to c++ status page
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3b88ce8e4a38767974f4efe42b348c31a187f71d;p=clang

link to c++ status page


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@55277 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index e5ed8e43a9..5eca9e5283 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -51,8 +51,8 @@
     <li>GCC supports languages that clang does not aim to, such as Java, Ada,
         FORTRAN, etc.</li>
     <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all
-        the variants we are interested in.  clang's support for C++ in
-        particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
+        the variants we are interested in.  <a href="cxx_status.html">clang's 
+        support for C++</a> in particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
     <li>GCC's codegen is much more mature than clang's right now and supports 
         more targets than LLVM.</li>
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>