From: Akira Hatanaka Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 03:04:15 +0000 (+0000) Subject: [CodeGen] Fix an assertion failure in CGRecordLowering. X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2cbd32574f151cbd67c1644b67f1cf7eea3fc18d;p=clang [CodeGen] Fix an assertion failure in CGRecordLowering. This patch fixes a bug in CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields where it unconditionally starts a new run and emits a storage field when it sees a zero-sized bitfield, which causes an assertion in insertPadding to fail when -fno-bitfield-type-align is used. It shouldn't emit new storage if UseZeroLengthBitfieldAlignment and UseBitFieldTypeAlignment are both false. rdar://problem/36762205 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@323943 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp index 1644ab4c07..d794b12b3d 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/CGRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp @@ -443,14 +443,18 @@ CGRecordLowering::accumulateBitFields(RecordDecl::field_iterator Field, // If the start field of a new run is better as a single run, or // if current field is better as a single run, or - // if current field has zero width bitfield, or + // if current field has zero width bitfield and either + // UseZeroLengthBitfieldAlignment or UseBitFieldTypeAlignment is set to + // true, or // if the offset of current field is inconsistent with the offset of // previous field plus its offset, // skip the block below and go ahead to emit the storage. // Otherwise, try to add bitfields to the run. if (!StartFieldAsSingleRun && Field != FieldEnd && !IsBetterAsSingleFieldRun(Field) && - Field->getBitWidthValue(Context) != 0 && + (Field->getBitWidthValue(Context) != 0 || + (!Context.getTargetInfo().useZeroLengthBitfieldAlignment() && + !Context.getTargetInfo().useBitFieldTypeAlignment())) && Tail == getFieldBitOffset(*Field)) { Tail += Field->getBitWidthValue(Context); ++Field; diff --git a/test/CodeGen/no-bitfield-type-align.c b/test/CodeGen/no-bitfield-type-align.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..830cd585c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/CodeGen/no-bitfield-type-align.c @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin -fno-bitfield-type-align -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s + +// CHECK: %[[STRUCT_S:.*]] = type { i32 } + +struct S { + unsigned short: 0; + unsigned short f1:15; + unsigned short: 0; + unsigned short f2:15; +}; + +// CHECK: define void @test_zero_width_bitfield(%[[STRUCT_S]]* %[[A:.*]]) +// CHECK: %[[BF_LOAD:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[V1:.*]], align 1 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CLEAR:.*]] = and i32 %[[BF_LOAD]], 32767 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CAST:.*]] = trunc i32 %[[BF_CLEAR]] to i16 +// CHECK: %[[CONV:.*]] = zext i16 %[[BF_CAST]] to i32 +// CHECK: %[[ADD:.*]] = add nsw i32 %[[CONV]], 1 +// CHECK: %[[CONV1:.*]] = trunc i32 %[[ADD]] to i16 +// CHECK: %[[V2:.*]] = zext i16 %[[CONV1]] to i32 +// CHECK: %[[BF_LOAD2:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[V1]], align 1 +// CHECK: %[[BF_VALUE:.*]] = and i32 %[[V2]], 32767 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CLEAR3:.*]] = and i32 %[[BF_LOAD2]], -32768 +// CHECK: %[[BF_SET:.*]] = or i32 %[[BF_CLEAR3]], %[[BF_VALUE]] +// CHECK: store i32 %[[BF_SET]], i32* %[[V1]], align 1 + +// CHECK: %[[BF_LOAD4:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[V4:.*]], align 1 +// CHECK: %[[BF_LSHR:.*]] = lshr i32 %[[BF_LOAD4]], 15 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CLEAR5:.*]] = and i32 %[[BF_LSHR]], 32767 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CAST6:.*]] = trunc i32 %[[BF_CLEAR5]] to i16 +// CHECK: %[[CONV7:.*]] = zext i16 %[[BF_CAST6]] to i32 +// CHECK: %[[ADD8:.*]] = add nsw i32 %[[CONV7]], 2 +// CHECK: %[[CONV9:.*]] = trunc i32 %[[ADD8]] to i16 +// CHECK: %[[V5:.*]] = zext i16 %[[CONV9]] to i32 +// CHECK: %[[BF_LOAD10:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[V4]], align 1 +// CHECK: %[[BF_VALUE11:.*]] = and i32 %[[V5]], 32767 +// CHECK: %[[BF_SHL:.*]] = shl i32 %[[BF_VALUE11]], 15 +// CHECK: %[[BF_CLEAR12:.*]] = and i32 %[[BF_LOAD10]], -1073709057 +// CHECK: %[[BF_SET13:.*]] = or i32 %[[BF_CLEAR12]], %[[BF_SHL]] +// CHECK: store i32 %[[BF_SET13]], i32* %[[V4]], align 1 + +void test_zero_width_bitfield(struct S *a) { + a->f1 += 1; + a->f2 += 2; +}