From: Justin Erenkrantz Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:38:31 +0000 (+0000) Subject: - Add note on the bad AP_DEBUG_ASSERT call. Is this a showstopper or can X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=228cf772361e3ab1900df155df32d350ec85cf37;p=apache - Add note on the bad AP_DEBUG_ASSERT call. Is this a showstopper or can it be indicated in the 2.0.31 release notes? Voice your opinions. - The worker CGI test failure Ken sees seems to be a problem with perl or httpd-test as no one else seems to be able to reproduce it. So, let's try to demote this. - I have no earthly idea what rbb is talking about. Whatever it may be, I can't fathom that it'd stop a release. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@93204 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 2e76b4e733..badc13c595 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/03 18:25:41 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/03 18:38:31 $] Release: @@ -60,6 +60,12 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: +1: Ian, Justin +0: -1: + * erroneous check in an AP_DEBUG_ASSERT() call. Only happens + in maintainer mode. Fixed in modules/http/http_protocol.c + revision 1.391. Add item in release notes: + +1: Justin + +0: + -1: * hasn't run for 3 days on Daedalus * the release has underscores instead of periods. @@ -74,7 +80,11 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: * Test suite failures: o worker is also failing some of the 'cgi' subtests (see ): - Justin says: "Worker should be fine and passes httpd-test here." + Justin says: "Worker should be fine and passes httpd-test here. + If you can provide evidence that it can be reproduced + outside of httpd-test, then it's a showstopper. I + think it's a perl or a httpd-test problem." + Not a showstopper: Justin * If any request gets to the core handler, without a flag that this r->filename was tested by dir/file_walk, we need to 500 at the very @@ -96,6 +106,7 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: Justin says: "Is this really a showstopper? This has been here forever. What's wrong? Does this have to do with autoconf or m4?" + Not a showstopper: Justin * Convert all instances of the old apr_lock_t type to the new types (once they are fully supported in APR).