From: Douglas Gregor Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:16:12 +0000 (+0000) Subject: Do not consider explicit constructors when performing a copy to a X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=153b3ba7a61f3228fd3a8c67b9bff94db3e13a2e;p=clang Do not consider explicit constructors when performing a copy to a temporary object. This is blindingly obvious from reading C++ [over.match.ctor]p1, but somehow I'd missed it and it took DR152 to educate me. Adjust one test that was relying on this non-standard behavior. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@101688 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- diff --git a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp index 4986fcbedf..db7c1b396a 100644 --- a/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp +++ b/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp @@ -3174,7 +3174,8 @@ static Sema::OwningExprResult CopyObject(Sema &S, // Only consider copy constructors. CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = dyn_cast(*Con); if (!Constructor || Constructor->isInvalidDecl() || - !Constructor->isCopyConstructor()) + !Constructor->isCopyConstructor() || + !Constructor->isConvertingConstructor(/*AllowExplicit=*/false)) continue; DeclAccessPair FoundDecl diff --git a/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp b/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp index ea67e6ffe2..0c4aa964cb 100644 --- a/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp +++ b/test/SemaCXX/copy-initialization.cpp @@ -1,18 +1,21 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s class X { public: - explicit X(const X&); - X(int*); // expected-note 2{{candidate constructor}} - explicit X(float*); + explicit X(const X&); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}} + X(int*); // expected-note 3{{candidate constructor}} + explicit X(float*); // expected-note {{candidate constructor}} }; class Y : public X { }; void f(Y y, int *ip, float *fp) { X x1 = y; // expected-error{{no matching constructor for initialization of 'X'}} - X x2 = 0; - X x3 = ip; + X x2 = 0; // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying variable}} + X x3 = ip; // expected-error{{no viable constructor copying variable}} X x4 = fp; // expected-error{{no viable conversion}} + X x2a(0); // expected-error{{call to constructor of 'X' is ambiguous}} + X x3a(ip); + X x4a(fp); } struct foo {