From: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:44:57 +0000 (-0700)
Subject: Assert that a dnode's bonuslen never exceeds its recorded size
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0e37a0f4f3bc4feb62a966a7c0dd64544172395f;p=zfs

Assert that a dnode's bonuslen never exceeds its recorded size

This patch introduces an assertion that can catch pitfalls in
development where there is a mismatch between the size of
reads and writes between a *_phys structure and its respective
in-core structure when bonus buffers are used.

This debugging-aid should be complementary to the verification
done by ztest in ztest_verify_dnode_bt().

A side to this patch is that we now clear out any extra bytes
past a bonus buffer's new size when the buffer is shrinking.

Reviewed-by: Matt Ahrens <matt@delphix.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Reviewed-by: Tom Caputi <tcaputi@datto.com>
Signed-off-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Closes #8348
---

diff --git a/module/zfs/dbuf.c b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
index 0518205f9..f8f96c142 100644
--- a/module/zfs/dbuf.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dbuf.c
@@ -3931,6 +3931,46 @@ dbuf_sync_indirect(dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 	zio_nowait(zio);
 }
 
+#ifdef ZFS_DEBUG
+/*
+ * Verify that the size of the data in our bonus buffer does not exceed
+ * its recorded size.
+ *
+ * The purpose of this verification is to catch any cases in development
+ * where the size of a phys structure (i.e space_map_phys_t) grows and,
+ * due to incorrect feature management, older pools expect to read more
+ * data even though they didn't actually write it to begin with.
+ *
+ * For a example, this would catch an error in the feature logic where we
+ * open an older pool and we expect to write the space map histogram of
+ * a space map with size SPACE_MAP_SIZE_V0.
+ */
+static void
+dbuf_sync_leaf_verify_bonus_dnode(dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr)
+{
+	dnode_t *dn = DB_DNODE(dr->dr_dbuf);
+
+	/*
+	 * Encrypted bonus buffers can have data past their bonuslen.
+	 * Skip the verification of these blocks.
+	 */
+	if (DMU_OT_IS_ENCRYPTED(dn->dn_bonustype))
+		return;
+
+	uint16_t bonuslen = dn->dn_phys->dn_bonuslen;
+	uint16_t maxbonuslen = DN_SLOTS_TO_BONUSLEN(dn->dn_num_slots);
+	ASSERT3U(bonuslen, <=, maxbonuslen);
+
+	arc_buf_t *datap = dr->dt.dl.dr_data;
+	char *datap_end = ((char *)datap) + bonuslen;
+	char *datap_max = ((char *)datap) + maxbonuslen;
+
+	/* ensure that everything is zero after our data */
+	for (; datap_end < datap_max; datap_end++)
+		ASSERT(*datap_end == 0);
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * dbuf_sync_leaf() is called recursively from dbuf_sync_list() so it is
  * critical the we not allow the compiler to inline this function in to
@@ -4007,6 +4047,10 @@ dbuf_sync_leaf(dbuf_dirty_record_t *dr, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 		    DN_MAX_BONUS_LEN(dn->dn_phys));
 		DB_DNODE_EXIT(db);
 
+#ifdef ZFS_DEBUG
+		dbuf_sync_leaf_verify_bonus_dnode(dr);
+#endif
+
 		if (*datap != db->db.db_data) {
 			int slots = DB_DNODE(db)->dn_num_slots;
 			int bonuslen = DN_SLOTS_TO_BONUSLEN(slots);
diff --git a/module/zfs/dnode.c b/module/zfs/dnode.c
index c9ff43fa6..ef62d394a 100644
--- a/module/zfs/dnode.c
+++ b/module/zfs/dnode.c
@@ -390,6 +390,14 @@ dnode_setbonuslen(dnode_t *dn, int newsize, dmu_tx_t *tx)
 	rw_enter(&dn->dn_struct_rwlock, RW_WRITER);
 	ASSERT3U(newsize, <=, DN_SLOTS_TO_BONUSLEN(dn->dn_num_slots) -
 	    (dn->dn_nblkptr-1) * sizeof (blkptr_t));
+
+	if (newsize < dn->dn_bonuslen) {
+		/* clear any data after the end of the new size */
+		size_t diff = dn->dn_bonuslen - newsize;
+		char *data_end = ((char *)dn->dn_bonus->db.db_data) + newsize;
+		bzero(data_end, diff);
+	}
+
 	dn->dn_bonuslen = newsize;
 	if (newsize == 0)
 		dn->dn_next_bonuslen[tx->tx_txg & TXG_MASK] = DN_ZERO_BONUSLEN;