From: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:41:06 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Back-patch "Fix EquivalenceClass processing for nested append relations". X-Git-Tag: REL9_2_9~17 X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0cf16686bcc97c9be083880617625bac3c088803;p=postgresql Back-patch "Fix EquivalenceClass processing for nested append relations". When we committed a87c729153e372f3731689a7be007bc2b53f1410, we somehow failed to notice that it didn't merely improve plan quality for expression indexes; there were very closely related cases that failed outright with "could not find pathkey item to sort". The failing cases seem to be those where the planner was already capable of selecting a MergeAppend plan, and there was inheritance involved: the lack of appropriate eclass child members would prevent prepare_sort_from_pathkeys() from succeeding on the MergeAppend's child plan nodes for inheritance child tables. Accordingly, back-patch into 9.1 through 9.3, along with an extra regression test case covering the problem. Per trouble report from Michael Glaesemann. --- diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c index 56bbaece3d..5c6470af72 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c @@ -1011,10 +1011,15 @@ get_cheapest_parameterized_child_path(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, * accumulate_append_subpath * Add a subpath to the list being built for an Append or MergeAppend * - * It's possible that the child is itself an Append path, in which case - * we can "cut out the middleman" and just add its child paths to our - * own list. (We don't try to do this earlier because we need to - * apply both levels of transformation to the quals.) + * It's possible that the child is itself an Append or MergeAppend path, in + * which case we can "cut out the middleman" and just add its child paths to + * our own list. (We don't try to do this earlier because we need to apply + * both levels of transformation to the quals.) + * + * Note that if we omit a child MergeAppend in this way, we are effectively + * omitting a sort step, which seems fine: if the parent is to be an Append, + * its result would be unsorted anyway, while if the parent is to be a + * MergeAppend, there's no point in a separate sort on a child. */ static List * accumulate_append_subpath(List *subpaths, Path *path) @@ -1026,6 +1031,13 @@ accumulate_append_subpath(List *subpaths, Path *path) /* list_copy is important here to avoid sharing list substructure */ return list_concat(subpaths, list_copy(apath->subpaths)); } + else if (IsA(path, MergeAppendPath)) + { + MergeAppendPath *mpath = (MergeAppendPath *) path; + + /* list_copy is important here to avoid sharing list substructure */ + return list_concat(subpaths, list_copy(mpath->subpaths)); + } else return lappend(subpaths, path); } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c index 19c2edfddd..e242db9dbb 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c @@ -1937,16 +1937,20 @@ add_child_rel_equivalences(PlannerInfo *root, if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile) continue; - /* No point in searching if parent rel not mentioned in eclass */ - if (!bms_is_subset(parent_rel->relids, cur_ec->ec_relids)) + /* + * No point in searching if parent rel not mentioned in eclass; but + * we can't tell that for sure if parent rel is itself a child. + */ + if (parent_rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL && + !bms_is_subset(parent_rel->relids, cur_ec->ec_relids)) continue; foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) { EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); - if (cur_em->em_is_const || cur_em->em_is_child) - continue; /* ignore consts and children here */ + if (cur_em->em_is_const) + continue; /* ignore consts here */ /* Does it reference parent_rel? */ if (bms_overlap(cur_em->em_relids, parent_rel->relids)) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c index c5df505d49..91be71351b 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c @@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ create_merge_append_plan(PlannerInfo *root, MergeAppendPath *best_path) /* Compute sort column info, and adjust MergeAppend's tlist as needed */ (void) prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(root, plan, pathkeys, - NULL, + best_path->path.parent->relids, NULL, true, &node->numCols, diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/union.out b/src/test/regress/expected/union.out index b7c4c7b312..beefea5cf4 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/union.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/union.out @@ -500,9 +500,39 @@ explain (costs off) Index Cond: (ab = 'ab'::text) (6 rows) +-- +-- Test that ORDER BY for UNION ALL can be pushed down to inheritance +-- children. +-- reset enable_seqscan; reset enable_indexscan; reset enable_bitmapscan; +set enable_indexonlyscan = off; +create table events (event_id int primary key); +NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "events_pkey" for table "events" +create table other_events (event_id int primary key); +NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "other_events_pkey" for table "other_events" +create table events_child () inherits (events); +explain (costs off) +select event_id + from (select event_id from events + union all + select event_id from other_events) ss + order by event_id; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------- + Result + -> Merge Append + Sort Key: public.events.event_id + -> Index Scan using events_pkey on events + -> Sort + Sort Key: public.events.event_id + -> Seq Scan on events_child events + -> Index Scan using other_events_pkey on other_events +(8 rows) + +drop table events_child, events, other_events; +reset enable_indexonlyscan; -- Test constraint exclusion of UNION ALL subqueries explain (costs off) SELECT * FROM diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/union.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/union.sql index 6194ce4751..7e895183e7 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/union.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/union.sql @@ -196,9 +196,30 @@ explain (costs off) SELECT * FROM t2) t WHERE ab = 'ab'; +-- +-- Test that ORDER BY for UNION ALL can be pushed down to inheritance +-- children. +-- + reset enable_seqscan; reset enable_indexscan; reset enable_bitmapscan; +set enable_indexonlyscan = off; + +create table events (event_id int primary key); +create table other_events (event_id int primary key); +create table events_child () inherits (events); + +explain (costs off) +select event_id + from (select event_id from events + union all + select event_id from other_events) ss + order by event_id; + +drop table events_child, events, other_events; + +reset enable_indexonlyscan; -- Test constraint exclusion of UNION ALL subqueries explain (costs off)