From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:22:59 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: add a con of clang vs gcc
X-Git-Url: https://granicus.if.org/sourcecode?a=commitdiff_plain;h=03c58a3c96afdc763e27ec2d18c0f712ec5823a6;p=clang

add a con of clang vs gcc


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@44882 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---

diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html
index 0c73491462..2c979b96e9 100644
--- a/www/comparison.html
+++ b/www/comparison.html
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@
     <li>GCC front-ends are very mature and already support C/C++/ObjC and all
         the variants we are interested in.  clang's support for C++ in
         particular is nowhere near what GCC supports.</li>
+    <li>GCC's codegen is much more mature than clang's right now.  clang is
+        only capable of codegen for small and simple projects and does not yet
+        support debug info.</li>
     <li>GCC is popular and widely adopted.</li>
     <li>GCC does not require a C++ compiler to build it.</li>
     </ul>