Without this patch, record decls with invalid out-of-line method delcs would
sometimes be marked invalid, but not always. With this patch, they are
consistently never marked invalid.
(The code to do this was added in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-
20100809/033154.html
, but the test from that revision is still passing.)
As far as I can tell, this was the only place where a class was marked invalid
after its definition was complete.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@197848
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
if (!NewFD->isInvalidDecl() && NewFD->isMSVCRTEntryPoint())
CheckMSVCRTEntryPoint(NewFD);
- if (NewFD->isInvalidDecl()) {
- // If this is a class member, mark the class invalid immediately.
- // This avoids some consistency errors later.
- if (CXXMethodDecl* methodDecl = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(NewFD))
- methodDecl->getParent()->setInvalidDecl();
- } else
+ if (!NewFD->isInvalidDecl())
D.setRedeclaration(CheckFunctionDeclaration(S, NewFD, Previous,
isExplicitSpecialization));
}
// <rdar://problem/8308215>: don't crash.
// Lots of questionable recovery here; errors can change.
namespace test3 {
- class A : public std::exception {}; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}} expected-error {{expected class name}} expected-note 4 {{candidate}}
+ class A : public std::exception {}; // expected-error {{undeclared identifier}} expected-error {{expected class name}} expected-note 2 {{candidate}}
class B : public A {
public:
B(const String& s, int e=0) // expected-error {{unknown type name}}
: A(e), m_String(s) , m_ErrorStr(__null) {} // expected-error {{no matching constructor}} expected-error {{does not name}}
B(const B& e)
: A(e), m_String(e.m_String), m_ErrorStr(__null) { // expected-error {{does not name}} \
- // expected-error {{no member named 'm_String' in 'test3::B'}} \
- // expected-error {{no matching}}
+ // expected-error {{no member named 'm_String' in 'test3::B'}}
}
};
}
}
namespace gatekeeper_v1 {
namespace gatekeeper_factory_v1 {
- struct closure_t { // expected-note {{'closure_t' declared here}}
+ struct closure_t { // expected-note {{'closure_t' declared here}} expected-note {{'gatekeeper_factory_v1::closure_t' declared here}}
gatekeeper_v1::closure_t* create(); // expected-error {{no type named 'closure_t' in namespace 'gatekeeper_v1'; did you mean simply 'closure_t'?}}
};
}
// FIXME: Typo correction should remove the 'gatekeeper_v1::' name specifier
- gatekeeper_v1::closure_t *x; // expected-error-re {{no type named 'closure_t' in namespace 'gatekeeper_v1'{{$}}}}
+ gatekeeper_v1::closure_t *x; // expected-error {{no type named 'closure_t' in namespace 'gatekeeper_v1'; did you mean 'gatekeeper_factory_v1::closure_t'}}
}
namespace Foo {
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+// Don't crash (PR18284).
+
+namespace n1 {
+class A { };
+class C { A a; };
+
+A::RunTest() {} // expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
+
+void f() {
+ new C;
+}
+} // namespace n1
+
+namespace n2 {
+class A { };
+class C : public A { };
+
+A::RunTest() {} // expected-error {{C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations}}
+
+void f() {
+ new C;
+}
+} // namespace n2