// If the type is dependent, we won't do the semantic analysis now.
// FIXME: should we check this in a more fine-grained manner?
- bool TypeDependent = DestType->isDependentType() || Ex.get()->isTypeDependent();
+ bool TypeDependent = DestType->isDependentType() ||
+ Ex.get()->isTypeDependent() ||
+ Ex.get()->isValueDependent();
CastOperation Op(*this, DestType, E);
Op.OpRange = SourceRange(OpLoc, Parens.getEnd());
}
// If the type is dependent, we won't do any other semantic analysis now.
- if (DestType->isDependentType() || SrcExpr.get()->isTypeDependent()) {
+ if (DestType->isDependentType() || SrcExpr.get()->isTypeDependent() ||
+ SrcExpr.get()->isValueDependent()) {
assert(Kind == CK_Dependent);
return;
}