// invalid).
if (R.empty() &&
NameInfo.getName().getNameKind() != DeclarationName::CXXConstructorName) {
+ // HACK: Work around a bug in libstdc++'s detection of ::gets. Sometimes
+ // it will believe that glibc provides a ::gets in cases where it does not,
+ // and will try to pull it into namespace std with a using-declaration.
+ // Just ignore the using-declaration in that case.
+ auto *II = NameInfo.getName().getAsIdentifierInfo();
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus14 && II && II->isStr("gets") &&
+ CurContext->isStdNamespace() &&
+ isa<TranslationUnitDecl>(LookupContext) &&
+ getSourceManager().isInSystemHeader(UsingLoc))
+ return nullptr;
if (TypoCorrection Corrected = CorrectTypo(
R.getLookupNameInfo(), R.getLookupKind(), S, &SS,
llvm::make_unique<UsingValidatorCCC>(
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only %s -std=c++14 -verify
+
+// This is a test for an egregious hack in Clang that works around
+// an issue with libstdc++'s detection of whether glibc provides a
+// ::gets function. If there is no ::gets, ignore
+// using ::gets;
+// in namespace std.
+//
+// See PR18402 and gcc.gnu.org/PR77795 for more details.
+
+#ifdef BE_THE_HEADER
+
+#pragma GCC system_header
+namespace std {
+ using ::gets;
+ using ::getx; // expected-error {{no member named 'getx'}}
+}
+
+#else
+
+#define BE_THE_HEADER
+#include "libstdcxx_pointer_return_false_hack.cpp"
+
+namespace foo {
+ using ::gets; // expected-error {{no member named 'gets'}}
+}
+
+#endif