Merging r195397:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r195397 | tstellar | 2013-11-21 16:39:23 -0800 (Thu, 21 Nov 2013) | 11 lines

Split SETCC if VSELECT requires splitting too.

This patch is a rewrite of the original patch commited in r194542. Instead of
relying on the type legalizer to do the splitting for us, we now peform the
splitting ourselves in the DAG combiner. This is necessary for the case where
the vector mask is a legal type after promotion and still wouldn't require
splitting.

Patch by: Juergen Ributzka

NOTE: This is a candidate for the 3.4 branch.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_34@195413 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

diff --git a/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h b/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h
index 4b3f904bc6cbefe33999d963f18b3afb727fbb3f..82becca315a1497ee8ffbd953377b503eb5b2877 100644 (file)
--- a/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h
+++ b/include/llvm/CodeGen/SelectionDAG.h
@@ -1149,7 +1149,8 @@ public:
 
   /// SplitVectorOperand - Split the node's operand with EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR and
   /// return the low/high part.
-  std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> SplitVectorOperand(SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo) {
+  std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> SplitVectorOperand(const SDNode *N, unsigned OpNo)
+  {
     return SplitVector(N->getOperand(OpNo), SDLoc(N));
   }
 

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
index 15b4ddc0338a4005482d50f6a3f17efe3aaab333..20b0981e973e0e56efc4b0b9d9f99c98f23aff51 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp
@@ -4327,6 +4327,23 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitSELECT(SDNode *N) {
   return SDValue();
 }
 
+static
+std::pair<SDValue, SDValue> SplitVSETCC(const SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
+  SDLoc DL(N);
+  EVT LoVT, HiVT;
+  llvm::tie(LoVT, HiVT) = DAG.GetSplitDestVTs(N->getValueType(0));
+
+  // Split the inputs.
+  SDValue Lo, Hi, LL, LH, RL, RH;
+  llvm::tie(LL, LH) = DAG.SplitVectorOperand(N, 0);
+  llvm::tie(RL, RH) = DAG.SplitVectorOperand(N, 1);
+
+  Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, LoVT, LL, RL, N->getOperand(2));
+  Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, HiVT, LH, RH, N->getOperand(2));
+
+  return std::make_pair(Lo, Hi);
+}
+
 SDValue DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT(SDNode *N) {
   SDValue N0 = N->getOperand(0);
   SDValue N1 = N->getOperand(1);
@@ -4364,27 +4381,32 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::visitVSELECT(SDNode *N) {
     }
   }
 
-  // Treat SETCC as a vector mask and promote the result type based on the
-  // targets expected SETCC result type. This will ensure that SETCC and VSELECT
-  // are both split by the type legalizer. This is done to prevent the type
-  // legalizer from unrolling SETCC into scalar comparions.
-  EVT SelectVT = N->getValueType(0);
-  EVT MaskVT = getSetCCResultType(SelectVT);
-  assert(MaskVT.isVector() && "Expected a vector type.");
-  if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC && N0.getValueType() != MaskVT) {
-    SDLoc MaskDL(N0);
+  // If the VSELECT result requires splitting and the mask is provided by a
+  // SETCC, then split both nodes and its operands before legalization. This
+  // prevents the type legalizer from unrolling SETCC into scalar comparisons
+  // and enables future optimizations (e.g. min/max pattern matching on X86).
+  if (N0.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
+    EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
+
+    // Check if any splitting is required.
+    if (TLI.getTypeAction(*DAG.getContext(), VT) !=
+        TargetLowering::TypeSplitVector)
+      return SDValue();
 
-    // Extend the mask to the desired value type.
-    ISD::NodeType ExtendCode =
-      TargetLowering::getExtendForContent(TLI.getBooleanContents(true));
-    SDValue Mask = DAG.getNode(ExtendCode, MaskDL, MaskVT, N0);
+    SDValue Lo, Hi, CCLo, CCHi, LL, LH, RL, RH;
+    llvm::tie(CCLo, CCHi) = SplitVSETCC(N0.getNode(), DAG);
+    llvm::tie(LL, LH) = DAG.SplitVectorOperand(N, 1);
+    llvm::tie(RL, RH) = DAG.SplitVectorOperand(N, 2);
 
-    AddToWorkList(Mask.getNode());
+    Lo = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, LL.getValueType(), CCLo, LL, RL);
+    Hi = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), DL, LH.getValueType(), CCHi, LH, RH);
 
-    SDValue LHS = N->getOperand(1);
-    SDValue RHS = N->getOperand(2);
+    // Add the new VSELECT nodes to the work list in case they need to be split
+    // again.
+    AddToWorkList(Lo.getNode());
+    AddToWorkList(Hi.getNode());
 
-    return DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, SelectVT, Mask, LHS, RHS);
+    return DAG.getNode(ISD::CONCAT_VECTORS, DL, VT, Lo, Hi);
   }
 
   return SDValue();

diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp
index 9e97c49ddff155fd81e0ac1f6dcc6105c5be99c5..b3174fd373c84fc3b3adcb217fa6ae7fa953643e 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypesGeneric.cpp
@@ -488,11 +488,11 @@ void DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitRes_SELECT(SDNode *N, SDValue &Lo,
   SDValue Cond = N->getOperand(0);
   CL = CH = Cond;
   if (Cond.getValueType().isVector()) {
-    if (Cond.getOpcode() == ISD::SETCC) {
-      assert(Cond.getValueType() == getSetCCResultType(N->getValueType(0)) &&
-             "Condition has not been prepared for split!");
+    // Check if there are already splitted versions of the vector available and
+    // use those instead of splitting the mask operand again.
+    if (getTypeAction(Cond.getValueType()) == TargetLowering::TypeSplitVector)
       GetSplitVector(Cond, CL, CH);
-    } else
+    else
       llvm::tie(CL, CH) = DAG.SplitVector(Cond, dl);
   }