InGroup<CXX98CompatPedantic>, DefaultIgnore;
def err_integer_too_large : Error<
"integer constant is larger than the largest unsigned integer type">;
-def warn_integer_too_large_for_signed : Warning<
- "integer constant is larger than the largest signed integer type">;
+def ext_integer_too_large_for_signed : ExtWarn<
+ "integer constant is larger than the largest signed integer type">,
+ InGroup<DiagGroup<"implicitly-unsigned-literal">>;
// Sema && AST
def note_invalid_subexpr_in_const_expr : Note<
// Literal
def ext_nonstandard_escape : Extension<
"use of non-standard escape character '\\%0'">;
-def ext_unknown_escape : ExtWarn<"unknown escape sequence '\\%0'">;
+def ext_unknown_escape : ExtWarn<"unknown escape sequence '\\%0'">,
+ InGroup<DiagGroup<"unknown-escape-sequence">>;
def err_invalid_decimal_digit : Error<"invalid digit '%0' in decimal constant">;
def err_invalid_binary_digit : Error<"invalid digit '%0' in binary constant">;
def err_invalid_octal_digit : Error<"invalid digit '%0' in octal constant">;
// large that it is unsigned" e.g. on 12345678901234567890 where intmax_t
// is 64-bits.
if (!Literal.isUnsigned && Result.Val.isNegative()) {
- // Don't warn for a hex or octal literal: 0x8000..0 shouldn't warn.
+ // Octal, hexadecimal, and binary literals are implicitly unsigned if
+ // the value does not fit into a signed integer type.
if (ValueLive && Literal.getRadix() == 10)
- PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::warn_integer_too_large_for_signed);
+ PP.Diag(PeekTok, diag::ext_integer_too_large_for_signed);
Result.Val.setIsUnsigned(true);
}
}
// If we still couldn't decide a type, we probably have something that
// does not fit in a signed long long, but has no U suffix.
if (Ty.isNull()) {
- Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::warn_integer_too_large_for_signed);
+ Diag(Tok.getLocation(), diag::ext_integer_too_large_for_signed);
Ty = Context.UnsignedLongLongTy;
Width = Context.getTargetInfo().getLongLongWidth();
}
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
-CHECK: Warnings without flags (108):
+CHECK: Warnings without flags (106):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_delete_void_ptr_operand
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
CHECK-NEXT: ext_explicit_specialization_storage_class
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands_nonstandard
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_function_pointers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
-CHECK-NEXT: ext_unknown_escape
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
CHECK-NEXT: pp_include_next_absolute_path
CHECK-NEXT: pp_include_next_in_primary
CHECK-NEXT: warn_incompatible_qualified_id
CHECK-NEXT: warn_initializer_string_for_char_array_too_long
CHECK-NEXT: warn_inline_namespace_reopened_noninline
-CHECK-NEXT: warn_integer_too_large_for_signed
CHECK-NEXT: warn_invalid_asm_cast_lvalue
CHECK-NEXT: warn_maynot_respond
CHECK-NEXT: warn_method_param_redefinition
<td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2341.pdf">N2341</a></td>
<td class="full" align="center">Clang 3.3</td>
</tr>
- <!-- Skipped N1627: Conditionally-support behavior -->
- <!-- Skipped N1727: Changing Undefined Behavior into Diagnosable Errors -->
+ <tr>
+ <td>Conditionally-support behavior</td>
+ <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1627.pdf">N1627</a></td>
+ <td class="full" align="center">Clang 2.9</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>Changing undefined behavior into diagnosable errors</td>
+ <td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2004/n1727.pdf">N1727</a></td>
+ <td class="full" align="center">Clang 2.9</td>
+ </tr>
<tr>
<td>Delegating constructors</td>
<td><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1986.pdf">N1986</a></td>