Summary:
When using a profile, we used to require the use -gmlt so that we could
get access to the line locations. This is used to match line numbers in
the input profile to the line numbers in the function's IR.
But this is actually not necessary. The driver can provide source
location tracking without the emission of debug information. In these
cases, the annotation 'llvm.dbg.cu' is missing from the IR, but the
actual line location annotations are still present.
This patch tells the driver to only emit source location tracking
when -fprofile-sample-use is present in the command line.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5888
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@220383
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
NeedLocTracking = true;
}
- // If the user requested one of the flags in the -Rpass family, make sure
- // that the backend tracks source location information.
+ // If the user requested to use a sample profile for PGO, then the
+ // backend will need to track source location information so the profile
+ // can be incorporated into the IR.
+ if (!Opts.SampleProfileFile.empty())
+ NeedLocTracking = true;
+
+ // If the user requested a flag that requires source locations available in
+ // the backend, make sure that the backend tracks source location information.
if (NeedLocTracking && Opts.getDebugInfo() == CodeGenOptions::NoDebugInfo)
Opts.setDebugInfo(CodeGenOptions::LocTrackingOnly);
--- /dev/null
+bar:100:100
+1: 2000
--- /dev/null
+// This file tests that -fprofile-sample-use enables location tracking
+// generation in the same way that -Rpass does. The sample profiler needs
+// to associate line locations in the profile to the code, so it needs the
+// frontend to emit source location annotations.
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fprofile-sample-use=%S/Inputs/profile-sample-use-loc-tracking.prof -emit-llvm -o - 2>/dev/null | FileCheck %s
+
+// -fprofile-sample-use should produce source location annotations, exclusively
+// (just like -gmlt).
+// CHECK: , !dbg !
+// CHECK-NOT: DW_TAG_base_type
+
+// But llvm.dbg.cu should be missing (to prevent writing debug info to
+// the final output).
+// CHECK-NOT: !llvm.dbg.cu = !{
+
+int bar(int j) {
+ return (j + j - 2) * (j - 2) * j;
+}