This patch ensures that clang processes the expression-nodes that are generated when disambiguating between types and expressions within template arguments as constant-expressions by installing the ConstantEvaluated ExpressionEvaluationContext just before attempting the disambiguation - and then making sure that Context carries through into ParseConstantExpression (by refactoring it out into a function that does not create its own EvaluationContext: ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext)
Note, prior to this patch, trunk would correctly disambiguate and identify the expression as an expression - and while it would annotate the token with the expression - it would fail to complete the odr-use processing (specifically, failing to trigger Sema::UpdateMarkingForLValueToRValue as is done for all Constant Expressions, which would remove it from being considered odr-used). By installing the ConstantExpression Evaluation Context prior to disambiguation, and making sure it carries though, we ensure correct processing of the expression-node.
For e.g:
template<int> struct X { };
void f() {
const int N = 10;
X<N> x; // should be OK.
[] { return X<N>{}; }; // Should be OK - no capture - but clang errors!
}
See a related bug: https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=25627
In summary (and reiteration), the fix is as follows:
- Remove the EnteredConstantEvaluatedContext action from ParseTemplateArgumentList (relying on ParseTemplateArgument getting it right)
- Add the EnteredConstantEvaluatedContext action just prior to undergoing the disambiguating parse, and if the parse succeeds for an expression, carry the context though into a refactored version of ParseConstantExpression that does not create its own ExpressionEvaluationContext.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D31588 for additional context regarding some of the more fragile and complicated approaches attempted, and Richard's feedback that eventually shaped the simpler and more robust rendition that is being committed.
Thanks Richard!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@303492
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
};
ExprResult ParseExpression(TypeCastState isTypeCast = NotTypeCast);
+ ExprResult ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext(TypeCastState isTypeCast);
ExprResult ParseConstantExpression(TypeCastState isTypeCast = NotTypeCast);
ExprResult ParseConstraintExpression();
// Expr that doesn't include commas.
return ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(R, prec::Assignment);
}
+ExprResult
+Parser::ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext(TypeCastState isTypeCast) {
+ assert(Actions.ExprEvalContexts.back().Context ==
+ Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated &&
+ "Call this function only if your ExpressionEvaluationContext is "
+ "already ConstantEvaluated");
+ ExprResult LHS(ParseCastExpression(false, false, isTypeCast));
+ ExprResult Res(ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(LHS, prec::Conditional));
+ return Actions.ActOnConstantExpression(Res);
+}
ExprResult Parser::ParseConstantExpression(TypeCastState isTypeCast) {
// C++03 [basic.def.odr]p2:
// C++98 and C++11 have no such rule, but this is only a defect in C++98.
EnterExpressionEvaluationContext ConstantEvaluated(
Actions, Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated);
-
- ExprResult LHS(ParseCastExpression(false, false, isTypeCast));
- ExprResult Res(ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(LHS, prec::Conditional));
- return Actions.ActOnConstantExpression(Res);
+ return ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext(isTypeCast);
}
/// \brief Parse a constraint-expression.
// expression is resolved to a type-id, regardless of the form of
// the corresponding template-parameter.
//
- // Therefore, we initially try to parse a type-id.
+ // Therefore, we initially try to parse a type-id - and isCXXTypeId might look
+ // up and annotate an identifier as an id-expression during disambiguation,
+ // so enter the appropriate context for a constant expression template
+ // argument before trying to disambiguate.
+
+ EnterExpressionEvaluationContext EnterConstantEvaluated(
+ Actions, Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated);
if (isCXXTypeId(TypeIdAsTemplateArgument)) {
SourceLocation Loc = Tok.getLocation();
TypeResult TypeArg = ParseTypeName(/*Range=*/nullptr,
// Parse a non-type template argument.
SourceLocation Loc = Tok.getLocation();
- ExprResult ExprArg = ParseConstantExpression(MaybeTypeCast);
+ ExprResult ExprArg = ParseConstantExpressionInExprEvalContext(MaybeTypeCast);
if (ExprArg.isInvalid() || !ExprArg.get())
return ParsedTemplateArgument();
/// template-argument-list ',' template-argument
bool
Parser::ParseTemplateArgumentList(TemplateArgList &TemplateArgs) {
- // Template argument lists are constant-evaluation contexts.
- EnterExpressionEvaluationContext EvalContext(
- Actions, Sema::ExpressionEvaluationContext::ConstantEvaluated);
+
ColonProtectionRAIIObject ColonProtection(*this, false);
do {
class S {};
void foo() {
- const int num = 18; // expected-note {{'num' declared here}}
+ const int num = 18;
auto outer = []() {
- auto inner = [](S<num> &X) {}; // expected-error {{variable 'num' cannot be implicitly captured in a lambda with no capture-default specified}}
+ auto inner = [](S<num> &X) {};
};
}
}
auto s1 = S1{[name=name]() {}}; // expected-error {{use of undeclared identifier 'name'; did you mean 'name1'?}}
}
}
+
+namespace PR25627_dont_odr_use_local_consts {
+
+ template<int> struct X {};
+
+ void foo() {
+ const int N = 10;
+ (void) [] { X<N> x; };
+ }
+}
};
}
}
+
+namespace PR25627_dont_odr_use_local_consts {
+ template<int> struct X { X(); X(int); };
+
+ void foo() {
+ const int N = 10;
+
+ struct Local {
+ void f(X<N> = X<N>()) {} // OK
+ };
+ }
+}
projects / clang / commitdiff