return OverflowResult::MayOverflow;
// If the sign of Add is the same as at least one of the operands, this add
- // CANNOT overflow. This is particularly useful when the sum is
- // @llvm.assume'ed non-negative rather than proved so from analyzing its
- // operands.
+ // CANNOT overflow. If this can be determined from the known bits of the
+ // operands the above signedAddMayOverflow() check will have already done so.
+ // The only other way to improve on the known bits is from an assumption, so
+ // call computeKnownBitsFromAssume() directly.
bool LHSOrRHSKnownNonNegative =
(LHSKnown.isNonNegative() || RHSKnown.isNonNegative());
bool LHSOrRHSKnownNegative =
(LHSKnown.isNegative() || RHSKnown.isNegative());
if (LHSOrRHSKnownNonNegative || LHSOrRHSKnownNegative) {
- KnownBits AddKnown = computeKnownBits(Add, DL, /*Depth=*/0, AC, CxtI, DT);
+ KnownBits AddKnown(LHSKnown.getBitWidth());
+ computeKnownBitsFromAssume(
+ Add, AddKnown, /*Depth=*/0, Query(DL, AC, CxtI, DT, true));
if ((AddKnown.isNonNegative() && LHSOrRHSKnownNonNegative) ||
- (AddKnown.isNegative() && LHSOrRHSKnownNegative)) {
+ (AddKnown.isNegative() && LHSOrRHSKnownNegative))
return OverflowResult::NeverOverflows;
- }
}
return OverflowResult::MayOverflow;