Summary:
The C++ Itanium ABI says:
No cookie is required if the new operator being used is ::operator new[](size_t, void*).
We should only avoid poisoning the cookie if we're calling this
operator, not others. This is dealt with before the call to
InitializeArrayCookie.
Reviewers: rjmccall, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41301
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@321645
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
llvm::Instruction *SI = CGF.Builder.CreateStore(NumElements, NumElementsPtr);
// Handle the array cookie specially in ASan.
- if (CGM.getLangOpts().Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Address) && AS == 0 &&
- expr->getOperatorNew()->isReplaceableGlobalAllocationFunction()) {
+ if (CGM.getLangOpts().Sanitize.has(SanitizerKind::Address) && AS == 0) {
// The store to the CookiePtr does not need to be instrumented.
CGM.getSanitizerMetadata()->disableSanitizerForInstruction(SI);
llvm::FunctionType *FTy =
std::nothrow_t nothrow;
}
void *operator new[](size_t, const std::nothrow_t &) throw();
-void *operator new[](size_t, char *);
+void *operator new[](size_t, void *);
struct C {
int x;
}
// ASAN-LABEL: CallPlacementNew
// ASAN-NOT: __asan_poison_cxx_array_cookie
+
+void *operator new[](size_t n, int);
+
+C *CallNewWithArgs() {
+// ASAN-LABEL: CallNewWithArgs
+// ASAN: call void @__asan_poison_cxx_array_cookie
+ return new (123) C[20];
+}