]> granicus.if.org Git - postgresql/commitdiff
Improve the check for pg_catalog.line data type in pg_upgrade
authorTomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>
Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:23:14 +0000 (13:23 +0200)
committerTomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@postgresql.org>
Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:25:25 +0000 (13:25 +0200)
The pg_upgrade check for pg_catalog.line data type when upgrading from
9.3 had a couple of issues with domains and composite types. Firstly, it
triggered false positives for composite types unused in objects with
storage. This was enough to trigger an unnecessary pg_upgrade failure:

  CREATE TYPE line_composite AS (l pg_catalog.line)

On the other hand, this only happened with composite types directly on
the pg_catalog.line data type, but not with a domain. So this was not
detected

  CREATE DOMAIN line_domain AS pg_catalog.line;
  CREATE TYPE line_composite_2 AS (l line_domain);

unlike the first example. These false positives and inconsistencies are
unfortunate, but what's worse we've failed to detected objects using the
pg_catalog.line data type through a domain. So we missed cases like this

  CREATE TABLE t (l line_composite_2);

The consequence is clusters broken after a pg_upgrade.

This fixes these false positives and false negatives by using the same
recursive CTE introduced by eaf900e842 for sql_identifier. 9.3 did not
support domains on composite types, but we can still have multi-level
composite types.

Backpatch all the way to 9.4, where the format for pg_catalog.line data
type changed.

Author: Tomas Vondra
Backpatch-to: 9.4-
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16045-673e8fa6b5ace196%40postgresql.org

src/bin/pg_upgrade/version.c

index 701b17740d3665ac01ea10e55190c13ecfb00aae..ac488f0bf266f470a3eda577839d35b4035abda8 100644 (file)
@@ -131,14 +131,42 @@ old_9_3_check_for_line_data_type_usage(ClusterInfo *cluster)
                DbInfo     *active_db = &cluster->dbarr.dbs[dbnum];
                PGconn     *conn = connectToServer(cluster, active_db->db_name);
 
+               /*
+                * The pg_catalog.line type may be wrapped in a domain or composite
+                * type, or both (9.3 did not allow domains on composite types, but
+                * there may be multi-level composite type). To detect these cases
+                * we need a recursive CTE.
+                */
                res = executeQueryOrDie(conn,
+                                                               "WITH RECURSIVE oids AS ( "
+               /* the pg_catalog.line type itself */
+                                                               "       SELECT 'pg_catalog.line'::pg_catalog.regtype AS oid "
+                                                               "       UNION ALL "
+                                                               "       SELECT * FROM ( "
+               /* domains on the type */
+                                                               "               WITH x AS (SELECT oid FROM oids) "
+                                                               "                       SELECT t.oid FROM pg_catalog.pg_type t, x WHERE typbasetype = x.oid AND typtype = 'd' "
+                                                               "                       UNION "
+               /* composite types containing the type */
+                                                               "                       SELECT t.oid FROM pg_catalog.pg_type t, pg_catalog.pg_class c, pg_catalog.pg_attribute a, x "
+                                                               "                       WHERE t.typtype = 'c' AND "
+                                                               "                                 t.oid = c.reltype AND "
+                                                               "                                 c.oid = a.attrelid AND "
+                                                               "                                 NOT a.attisdropped AND "
+                                                               "                                 a.atttypid = x.oid "
+                                                               "       ) foo "
+                                                               ") "
                                                                "SELECT n.nspname, c.relname, a.attname "
                                                                "FROM   pg_catalog.pg_class c, "
                                                                "               pg_catalog.pg_namespace n, "
                                                                "               pg_catalog.pg_attribute a "
                                                                "WHERE  c.oid = a.attrelid AND "
                                                                "               NOT a.attisdropped AND "
-                                                               "               a.atttypid = 'pg_catalog.line'::pg_catalog.regtype AND "
+                                                               "               a.atttypid IN (SELECT oid FROM oids) AND "
+                                                               "               c.relkind IN ("
+                                                               CppAsString2(RELKIND_RELATION) ", "
+                                                               CppAsString2(RELKIND_MATVIEW) ", "
+                                                               CppAsString2(RELKIND_INDEX) ") AND "
                                                                "               c.relnamespace = n.oid AND "
                /* exclude possible orphaned temp tables */
                                                                "               n.nspname !~ '^pg_temp_' AND "