declarator just because we were able to build an invalid decl
for it. The invalid-type diagnostics, in particular, are still useful
to know, and may indicate something about why the decl is invalid.
Also, recover from an illegal pointer/reference-to-unqualified-retainable
type using __strong instead of __autoreleasing; in general, a random
object is much more likely to be __strong, so this avoids unnecessary
cascading errors in the most common case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@149074
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
// We only want to actually emit delayed diagnostics when we
// successfully parsed a decl.
- if (decl && !decl->isInvalidDecl()) {
+ if (decl) {
// We emit all the active diagnostics, not just those starting
// from the saved state. The idea is this: we get one push for a
// decl spec and another for each declarator; in a decl group like:
switch (diag.Kind) {
case DelayedDiagnostic::Deprecation:
- S.HandleDelayedDeprecationCheck(diag, decl);
+ // Don't bother giving deprecation diagnostics if the decl is invalid.
+ if (!decl->isInvalidDecl())
+ S.HandleDelayedDeprecationCheck(diag, decl);
break;
case DelayedDiagnostic::Access:
} else if (S.ExprEvalContexts.back().Context == Sema::Unevaluated) {
return type;
- // If that failed, give an error and recover using __autoreleasing.
+ // If that failed, give an error and recover using __strong. __strong
+ // is the option most likely to prevent spurious second-order diagnostics,
+ // like when binding a reference to a field.
} else {
// These types can show up in private ivars in system headers, so
// we need this to not be an error in those cases. Instead we
} else {
S.Diag(loc, diag::err_arc_indirect_no_ownership) << type << isReference;
}
- implicitLifetime = Qualifiers::OCL_Autoreleasing;
+ implicitLifetime = Qualifiers::OCL_Strong;
}
assert(implicitLifetime && "didn't infer any lifetime!");
- (id)not_ret:(id) b __attribute((ns_returns_retained)); // expected-error {{overriding method has mismatched ns_returns_retained attributes}}
- (id)both__returns_not_retained:(id) b __attribute((ns_returns_not_retained));
@end
+
+// Test that we give a good diagnostic here that mentions the missing
+// ownership qualifier. We don't want this to get suppressed because
+// of an invalid conversion.
+void test7(void) {
+ id x;
+ id *px = &x; // expected-error {{pointer to non-const type 'id' with no explicit ownership}}
+
+ I *y;
+ J **py = &y; // expected-error {{pointer to non-const type 'J *' with no explicit ownership}} expected-warning {{incompatible pointer types initializing}}
+}