type. It leads to very weird errors.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@62124
91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-
96231b3b80d8
switch (Kind) {
case DeclarationName::CXXConstructorName:
EKind = DeclarationNameExtra::CXXConstructor;
+ assert(Ty.getCVRQualifiers() == 0 && "Constructor type must be unqualified");
break;
case DeclarationName::CXXDestructorName:
EKind = DeclarationNameExtra::CXXDestructor;
+ assert(Ty.getCVRQualifiers() == 0 && "Destructor type must be unqualified");
break;
case DeclarationName::CXXConversionFunctionName:
EKind = DeclarationNameExtra::CXXConversionFunction;
CXXRecordDecl *ToRecordDecl = ToRecordType->getDecl();
DeclarationName ConstructorName
= Context.DeclarationNames.getCXXConstructorName(
- Context.getCanonicalType(ToType));
+ Context.getCanonicalType(ToType).getUnqualifiedType());
DeclContext::lookup_iterator Con, ConEnd;
for (llvm::tie(Con, ConEnd) = ToRecordDecl->lookup(ConstructorName);
Con != ConEnd; ++Con) {
int &i2 = a2->m;
a3->m; // expected-error{{no viable overloaded 'operator->'; candidate is}}
}
+
+struct CopyConBase {
+};
+
+struct CopyCon : public CopyConBase {
+ CopyCon(const CopyConBase &Base);
+
+ CopyCon(const CopyConBase *Base) {
+ *this = *Base;
+ }
+};