struct BitcodeLTOInfo {
bool IsThinLTO;
bool HasSummary;
+ bool EnableSplitLTOUnit;
};
/// Represents a module in a bitcode file.
/// union.
bool HaveGVs;
+ // True if the index was created for a module compiled with -fsplit-lto-unit.
+ bool EnableSplitLTOUnit;
+
+ // True if some of the modules were compiled with -fsplit-lto-unit and
+ // some were not. Set when the combined index is created during the thin link.
+ bool PartiallySplitLTOUnits = false;
+
std::set<std::string> CfiFunctionDefs;
std::set<std::string> CfiFunctionDecls;
public:
// See HaveGVs variable comment.
- ModuleSummaryIndex(bool HaveGVs) : HaveGVs(HaveGVs), Saver(Alloc) {}
+ ModuleSummaryIndex(bool HaveGVs, bool EnableSplitLTOUnit = false)
+ : HaveGVs(HaveGVs), EnableSplitLTOUnit(EnableSplitLTOUnit), Saver(Alloc) {
+ }
bool haveGVs() const { return HaveGVs; }
SkipModuleByDistributedBackend = true;
}
+ bool enableSplitLTOUnit() const { return EnableSplitLTOUnit; }
+ void setEnableSplitLTOUnit() { EnableSplitLTOUnit = true; }
+
+ bool partiallySplitLTOUnits() const { return PartiallySplitLTOUnits; }
+ void setPartiallySplitLTOUnits() { PartiallySplitLTOUnits = true; }
+
bool isGlobalValueLive(const GlobalValueSummary *GVS) const {
return !WithGlobalValueDeadStripping || GVS->isLive();
}
Error runThinLTO(AddStreamFn AddStream, NativeObjectCache Cache);
mutable bool CalledGetMaxTasks = false;
+
+ // Use Optional to distinguish false from not yet initialized.
+ Optional<bool> EnableSplitLTOUnit;
};
/// The resolution for a symbol. The linker must provide a SymbolResolution for
std::function<BlockFrequencyInfo *(const Function &F)> GetBFICallback,
ProfileSummaryInfo *PSI) {
assert(PSI);
- ModuleSummaryIndex Index(/*HaveGVs=*/true);
+ bool EnableSplitLTOUnit = false;
+ if (auto *MD = mdconst::extract_or_null<ConstantInt>(
+ M.getModuleFlag("EnableSplitLTOUnit")))
+ EnableSplitLTOUnit = MD->getZExtValue();
+ ModuleSummaryIndex Index(/*HaveGVs=*/true, EnableSplitLTOUnit);
// Identify the local values in the llvm.used and llvm.compiler.used sets,
// which should not be exported as they would then require renaming and
break;
case bitc::FS_FLAGS: { // [flags]
uint64_t Flags = Record[0];
- // Scan flags (set only on the combined index).
- assert(Flags <= 0x3 && "Unexpected bits in flag");
+ // Scan flags.
+ assert(Flags <= 0x1f && "Unexpected bits in flag");
// 1 bit: WithGlobalValueDeadStripping flag.
+ // Set on combined index only.
if (Flags & 0x1)
TheIndex.setWithGlobalValueDeadStripping();
// 1 bit: SkipModuleByDistributedBackend flag.
+ // Set on combined index only.
if (Flags & 0x2)
TheIndex.setSkipModuleByDistributedBackend();
// 1 bit: HasSyntheticEntryCounts flag.
+ // Set on combined index only.
if (Flags & 0x4)
TheIndex.setHasSyntheticEntryCounts();
+ // 1 bit: DisableSplitLTOUnit flag.
+ // Set on per module indexes. It is up to the client to validate
+ // the consistency of this flag across modules being linked.
+ if (Flags & 0x8)
+ TheIndex.setEnableSplitLTOUnit();
+ // 1 bit: PartiallySplitLTOUnits flag.
+ // Set on combined index only.
+ if (Flags & 0x10)
+ TheIndex.setPartiallySplitLTOUnits();
break;
}
case bitc::FS_VALUE_GUID: { // [valueid, refguid]
return std::move(Index);
}
+static Expected<bool> getEnableSplitLTOUnitFlag(BitstreamCursor &Stream,
+ unsigned ID) {
+ if (Stream.EnterSubBlock(ID))
+ return error("Invalid record");
+ SmallVector<uint64_t, 64> Record;
+
+ while (true) {
+ BitstreamEntry Entry = Stream.advanceSkippingSubblocks();
+
+ switch (Entry.Kind) {
+ case BitstreamEntry::SubBlock: // Handled for us already.
+ case BitstreamEntry::Error:
+ return error("Malformed block");
+ case BitstreamEntry::EndBlock:
+ // If no flags record found, conservatively return true to mimic
+ // behavior before this flag was added.
+ return true;
+ case BitstreamEntry::Record:
+ // The interesting case.
+ break;
+ }
+
+ // Look for the FS_FLAGS record.
+ Record.clear();
+ auto BitCode = Stream.readRecord(Entry.ID, Record);
+ switch (BitCode) {
+ default: // Default behavior: ignore.
+ break;
+ case bitc::FS_FLAGS: { // [flags]
+ uint64_t Flags = Record[0];
+ // Scan flags.
+ assert(Flags <= 0x1f && "Unexpected bits in flag");
+
+ return Flags & 0x8;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Exit infinite loop");
+}
+
// Check if the given bitcode buffer contains a global value summary block.
Expected<BitcodeLTOInfo> BitcodeModule::getLTOInfo() {
BitstreamCursor Stream(Buffer);
case BitstreamEntry::Error:
return error("Malformed block");
case BitstreamEntry::EndBlock:
- return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/false, /*HasSummary=*/false};
+ return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/false, /*HasSummary=*/false,
+ /*EnableSplitLTOUnit=*/false};
case BitstreamEntry::SubBlock:
- if (Entry.ID == bitc::GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK_ID)
- return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/true, /*HasSummary=*/true};
+ if (Entry.ID == bitc::GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK_ID) {
+ Expected<bool> EnableSplitLTOUnit =
+ getEnableSplitLTOUnitFlag(Stream, Entry.ID);
+ if (!EnableSplitLTOUnit)
+ return EnableSplitLTOUnit.takeError();
+ return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/true, /*HasSummary=*/true,
+ *EnableSplitLTOUnit};
+ }
- if (Entry.ID == bitc::FULL_LTO_GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK_ID)
- return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/false, /*HasSummary=*/true};
+ if (Entry.ID == bitc::FULL_LTO_GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK_ID) {
+ Expected<bool> EnableSplitLTOUnit =
+ getEnableSplitLTOUnitFlag(Stream, Entry.ID);
+ if (!EnableSplitLTOUnit)
+ return EnableSplitLTOUnit.takeError();
+ return BitcodeLTOInfo{/*IsThinLTO=*/false, /*HasSummary=*/true,
+ *EnableSplitLTOUnit};
+ }
// Ignore other sub-blocks.
if (Stream.SkipBlock())
Stream.EmitRecord(bitc::FS_VERSION, ArrayRef<uint64_t>{INDEX_VERSION});
+ // Write the index flags.
+ uint64_t Flags = 0;
+ // Bits 1-3 are set only in the combined index, skip them.
+ if (Index->enableSplitLTOUnit())
+ Flags |= 0x8;
+ Stream.EmitRecord(bitc::FS_FLAGS, ArrayRef<uint64_t>{Flags});
+
if (Index->begin() == Index->end()) {
Stream.ExitBlock();
return;
Flags |= 0x2;
if (Index.hasSyntheticEntryCounts())
Flags |= 0x4;
+ if (Index.enableSplitLTOUnit())
+ Flags |= 0x8;
+ if (Index.partiallySplitLTOUnits())
+ Flags |= 0x10;
Stream.EmitRecord(bitc::FS_FLAGS, ArrayRef<uint64_t>{Flags});
for (const auto &GVI : valueIds()) {
if (!LTOInfo)
return LTOInfo.takeError();
+ if (EnableSplitLTOUnit.hasValue()) {
+ // If only some modules were split, flag this in the index so that
+ // we can skip or error on optimizations that need consistently split
+ // modules (whole program devirt and lower type tests).
+ if (EnableSplitLTOUnit.getValue() != LTOInfo->EnableSplitLTOUnit)
+ ThinLTO.CombinedIndex.setPartiallySplitLTOUnits();
+ } else
+ EnableSplitLTOUnit = LTOInfo->EnableSplitLTOUnit;
+
BitcodeModule BM = Input.Mods[ModI];
auto ModSyms = Input.module_symbols(ModI);
addModuleToGlobalRes(ModSyms, {ResI, ResE},
!ExportSummary && !ImportSummary)
return false;
+ // If only some of the modules were split, we cannot correctly handle
+ // code that contains type tests.
+ if (TypeTestFunc && !TypeTestFunc->use_empty() &&
+ ((ExportSummary && ExportSummary->partiallySplitLTOUnits()) ||
+ (ImportSummary && ImportSummary->partiallySplitLTOUnits())))
+ report_fatal_error("inconsistent LTO Unit splitting with llvm.type.test");
+
if (ImportSummary) {
if (TypeTestFunc) {
for (auto UI = TypeTestFunc->use_begin(), UE = TypeTestFunc->use_end();
}
}
-// Returns whether this module needs to be split because it uses type metadata.
+// Returns whether this module needs to be split because splitting is
+// enabled and it uses type metadata.
bool requiresSplit(Module &M) {
+ // First check if the LTO Unit splitting has been enabled.
+ bool EnableSplitLTOUnit = false;
+ if (auto *MD = mdconst::extract_or_null<ConstantInt>(
+ M.getModuleFlag("EnableSplitLTOUnit")))
+ EnableSplitLTOUnit = MD->getZExtValue();
+ if (!EnableSplitLTOUnit)
+ return false;
+
+ // Module only needs to be split if it contains type metadata.
for (auto &GO : M.global_objects()) {
if (GO.hasMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_type))
return true;
void writeThinLTOBitcode(raw_ostream &OS, raw_ostream *ThinLinkOS,
function_ref<AAResults &(Function &)> AARGetter,
Module &M, const ModuleSummaryIndex *Index) {
- // See if this module has any type metadata. If so, we need to split it.
+ // Split module if splitting is enabled and it contains any type metadata.
if (requiresSplit(M))
return splitAndWriteThinLTOBitcode(OS, ThinLinkOS, AARGetter, M);
M.getFunction(Intrinsic::getName(Intrinsic::type_checked_load));
Function *AssumeFunc = M.getFunction(Intrinsic::getName(Intrinsic::assume));
+ // If only some of the modules were split, we cannot correctly handle
+ // code that contains type tests or type checked loads.
+ if ((ExportSummary && ExportSummary->partiallySplitLTOUnits()) ||
+ (ImportSummary && ImportSummary->partiallySplitLTOUnits())) {
+ if ((TypeTestFunc && !TypeTestFunc->use_empty()) ||
+ (TypeCheckedLoadFunc && !TypeCheckedLoadFunc->use_empty()))
+ report_fatal_error("inconsistent LTO Unit splitting with llvm.type.test "
+ "or llvm.type.checked.load");
+ return false;
+ }
+
// Normally if there are no users of the devirtualization intrinsics in the
// module, this pass has nothing to do. But if we are exporting, we also need
// to handle any users that appear only in the function summaries.
; CHECK-NEXT: <FUNCTION op0=4 op1=7
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; See if the call to func is registered.
; The value id 1 matches the second FUNCTION record above.
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op6=1/>
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op4=0 op5=0 op6=[[ALIASID:[0-9]+]]/>
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op0=[[ALIASEEID:[0-9]+]]
; CHECK-NEXT: <ALIAS {{.*}} op0=[[ALIASID]] {{.*}} op2=[[ALIASEEID]]/>
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; "op7" is a call to "callee" function.
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op8=3 op9=[[ALIASID:[0-9]+]]/>
; "another_caller" has only references but no calls.
; CHECK-NEXT: <FUNCTION op0=4 op1=4
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; See if the call to func is registered, using the expected hotness type.
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE_PROFILE {{.*}} op6=1 op7=2/>
; CHECK-NEXT: </GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK>
; CHECK-NEXT: <FUNCTION op0=42 op1=5
; CHECK-LABEL: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; CHECK-NEXT: <VALUE_GUID op0=25 op1=123/>
; op4=hot1 op6=cold op8=hot2 op10=hot4 op12=none1 op14=hot3 op16=none2 op18=none3 op20=123
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE_PROFILE {{.*}} op6=1 op7=3 op8=5 op9=1 op10=2 op11=3 op12=4 op13=1 op14=6 op15=2 op16=3 op17=3 op18=7 op19=2 op20=8 op21=2 op22=25 op23=4/>
; CHECK-NEXT: <FUNCTION op0=17 op1=4
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; See if the call to func is registered.
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE_RELBF {{.*}} op4=1 {{.*}} op8=256
; CHECK-NEXT: </GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK>
; CHECK-LABEL: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; CHECK-NEXT: <VALUE_GUID op0=26 op1=123/>
; op4=none1 op6=hot1 op8=cold1 op10=none2 op12=hot2 op14=cold2 op16=none3 op18=hot3 op20=cold3 op22=123
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE_PROFILE {{.*}} op6=7 op7=0 op8=1 op9=3 op10=4 op11=1 op12=8 op13=0 op14=2 op15=3 op16=5 op17=1 op18=9 op19=0 op20=3 op21=3 op22=6 op23=1 op24=26 op25=4/>
; CHECK-NEXT: <FUNCTION op0=17 op1=4
; CHECK: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; CHECK-NEXT: <VERSION
+; CHECK-NEXT: <FLAGS
; See if the call to func is registered
; CHECK-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op4=1
; CHECK-NEXT: </GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK>
; BC-NEXT: <ALIAS op0=67 op1=1
; BC: <GLOBALVAL_SUMMARY_BLOCK
; BC-NEXT: <VERSION
+; BC-NEXT: <FLAGS
; BC-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op0=1 op1=0
; BC-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op0=2 op1=0
; BC-NEXT: <PERMODULE {{.*}} op0=3 op1=7
; the full LTO object file; any such functions will be referenced by the jump
; table.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -o %t2 -r %t,f1,p -r %t,f2,p -r %t,_start,px %t -save-temps
; RUN: llvm-dis %t2.1.2.internalize.bc -o - | FileCheck %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t0.bc %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t0.bc %s
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -r %t0.bc,__imp_f,l \
; RUN: -r %t0.bc,g,p \
; RUN: -r %t0.bc,g,l \
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -r %t,f,plx -r %t,g_alias,plx -r %t,foo,lx -r %t,foo,plx -r %t,bar,lx -r %t,bar,plx -o %t1 %t
; RUN: llvm-nm %t1.0 | FileCheck --check-prefix=MERGED %s
; RUN: llvm-nm %t1.1 | FileCheck %s
--- /dev/null
+; Test to ensure that the Enable Split LTO Unit flag is set properly in the
+; summary, and that we correctly silently handle linking bitcode files with
+; different values of this flag.
+
+; Linking bitcode both with EnableSplitLTOUnit set should work
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t1 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t2 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -o %t3 %t1 %t2
+
+; Linking bitcode both without EnableSplitLTOUnit set should work
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit=false -o %t1 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOSPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit=false -o %t2 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOSPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -o %t3 %t1 %t2
+
+; Linking bitcode with different values of EnableSplitLTOUnit should succeed
+; (silently skipping any optimizations like whole program devirt that rely
+; on all modules being split).
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t1 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit=false -o %t2 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOSPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -o %t3 %t1 %t2
+
+; Linking bitcode with different values of EnableSplitLTOUnit (reverse order)
+; should succeed (silently skipping any optimizations like whole program devirt
+; that rely on all modules being split).
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit=false -o %t1 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOSPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NOENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t2 %s
+; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=SPLITLTOUNIT
+; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ENABLESPLITFLAG
+; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -o %t3 %t1 %t2
+
+; The flag should be set when splitting is disabled (for backwards compatibility
+; with older bitcode where it was always enabled).
+; SPLITLTOUNIT: <FLAGS op0=8/>
+; NOSPLITLTOUNIT: <FLAGS op0=0/>
+
+; Check that the corresponding module flag is set when expected.
+; ENABLESPLITFLAG: !{i32 1, !"EnableSplitLTOUnit", i32 1}
+; NOENABLESPLITFLAG-NOT: !{i32 1, !"EnableSplitLTOUnit", i32 1}
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
; This affects code generated for any users of f(). Make sure that we don't pull a stale object
; file for %t.o from the cache.
-; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary -thinlto-bc %s -o %t.bc
-; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary -thinlto-bc %p/Inputs/cache-icall.ll -o %t2.bc
+; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit %s -o %t.bc
+; RUN: opt -module-hash -module-summary -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit %p/Inputs/cache-icall.ll -o %t2.bc
; RUN: rm -Rf %t.cache && mkdir %t.cache
; Test CFI devirtualization through the thin link and backend.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t.o %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t.o %s
; Legacy PM
; FIXME: Fix machine verifier issues and remove -verify-machineinstrs=0. PR39436.
; REMARK: single-impl: devirtualized a call to _ZN1A1nEi
+; Next check that we emit an error when trying to LTO link this module
+; containing an llvm.type.checked.load (with a split LTO Unit) with one
+; that does not have a split LTO Unit.
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t2.o %S/Inputs/empty.ll
+; RUN: not llvm-lto2 run %t.o %t2.o -save-temps -pass-remarks=. \
+; RUN: -verify-machineinstrs=0 \
+; RUN: -o %t3 \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,test,px \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1A1nEi,p \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1B1fEi,p \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1C1fEi,p \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,empty,p \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZTV1B, \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZTV1C, \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1A1nEi, \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1B1fEi, \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZN1C1fEi, \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZTV1B,px \
+; RUN: -r=%t.o,_ZTV1C,px 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ERROR
+; ERROR: LLVM ERROR: inconsistent LTO Unit splitting with llvm.type.test or llvm.type.checked.load
+
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu"
; Test to ensure that only referenced type ID records are emitted into
; each distributed index file.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t1.o %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t2.o %p/Inputs/cfi-distributed.ll
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t1.o %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t2.o %p/Inputs/cfi-distributed.ll
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -thinlto-distributed-indexes %t1.o %t2.o \
; RUN: -o %t3 \
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc %s -o %t1.bc
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit %s -o %t1.bc
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -thinlto-distributed-indexes %t1.bc -o %t.out -save-temps \
; RUN: -r %t1.bc,foo,plx \
; RUN: -r %t1.bc,bar,x \
; Test CFI through the thin link and backend.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t.o %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t.o %s
; Legacy PM
; RUN: llvm-lto2 run -save-temps %t.o \
; will use the same vtable pointer. Without a dominance check, we could
; incorrectly devirtualize a->foo() to B::foo();
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t.o %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t.o %s
; Legacy PM
; FIXME: Fix machine verifier issues and remove -verify-machineinstrs=0. PR39436.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M1 %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=THIN %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=MERGED %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK1 %s
; CHECK0-NOT: @{{.*}}anon{{.*}}=
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK1 %s
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
; Test for a bug specific to the new pass manager where we may build a domtree
; to make more precise AA queries for functions.
;
-; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=default -passes='no-op-module' -debug-pass-manager -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -aa-pipeline=default -passes='no-op-module' -debug-pass-manager -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M1 %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o %t0 %t
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o %t1 %t
; RUN: not llvm-modextract -b -n 2 -o - %t 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o %t0 %t
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o %t1 %t
; RUN: not llvm-modextract -b -n 2 -o - %t 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o %t0 %t
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o %t1 %t
; RUN: not llvm-modextract -b -n 2 -o - %t 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M1 %s
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M1 %s
; Generate bitcode files with summary, as well as minimized bitcode without
; the debug metadata for the thin link.
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thin-link-bitcode-file=%t2 -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thin-link-bitcode-file=%t2 -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o %t0.bc %t
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o %t1.bc %t
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o %t0.thinlink.bc %t2
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck %s
; The target assembly parser is required to parse the symver directives
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thin-link-bitcode-file=%t2 -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thin-link-bitcode-file=%t2 -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-dis -o - %t | FileCheck %s
; RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t | FileCheck --check-prefix=BCA %s
; When not splitting the module, the thin link bitcode file should simply be a
ret void
}
-; CHECK: !llvm.module.flags = !{![[FLAG:[0-9]+]]}
-; CHECK: ![[FLAG]] = !{i32 1, !"ThinLTO", i32 0}
+; CHECK: !llvm.module.flags = !{![[FLAG1:[0-9]+]], ![[FLAG2:[0-9]+]]}
+; CHECK: ![[FLAG1]] = !{i32 1, !"EnableSplitLTOUnit", i32 1}
+; CHECK: ![[FLAG2]] = !{i32 1, !"ThinLTO", i32 0}
!0 = !{i32 0, !"typeid"}
-; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -o %t %s
+; RUN: opt -thinlto-bc -thinlto-split-lto-unit -o %t %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 0 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M0 %s
; RUN: llvm-modextract -b -n 1 -o - %t | llvm-dis | FileCheck --check-prefix=M1 %s
OutputThinLTOBC("thinlto-bc",
cl::desc("Write output as ThinLTO-ready bitcode"));
+static cl::opt<bool>
+ SplitLTOUnit("thinlto-split-lto-unit",
+ cl::desc("Enable splitting of a ThinLTO LTOUnit"));
+
static cl::opt<std::string> ThinLinkBitcodeFile(
"thin-link-bitcode-file", cl::value_desc("filename"),
cl::desc(
if (CheckBitcodeOutputToConsole(Out->os(), !Quiet))
NoOutput = true;
+ if (OutputThinLTOBC)
+ M->addModuleFlag(Module::Error, "EnableSplitLTOUnit", SplitLTOUnit);
+
if (PassPipeline.getNumOccurrences() > 0) {
OutputKind OK = OK_NoOutput;
if (!NoOutput)